I'm not talking about Iguodala for a while at RealGM, but I had a question, so I'll ask it here:
Players should be paid in order to build a winner, but do you think a player should be paid a bit more if they are exciting to watch, and a little less if they are boring?
The NBA is an entertainment business- and they ussually pay guys a big premium if they put people in the seats (like AI.) I don't think fans pay to go see Iguodala, but I expect the arena to really rock when the team gets out on the break- especially if Iguodala throws it down. There is some team value in this, as getting the crowd pumped can sometimes spark the team- but do you think it is worth $'s?
Conversely, a guy like Miller who is much less flashy (except for some of the passes), should he get paid less for being dull? Should Duncan? Both players lead to wins, and do things that result in teammates making exciting plays, so maybe they should not get punished for being fundamentally solid.