Keeper questions about the FNBA league.

[Randy]

You may keep 1 keeper 2 years and another keeper 1 year.

As unfair an advantage I think that the GM's who have TD, KG, and Dirk have, I think this is a horrible idea.  You could go from having 1 great keeper, a decent keeper and some solid role players to having 2 decent keepers.  I think you penalize them for having the best players by the draft order.  If they want to complain, they can trade me for TD or KG.  :lol:  

[Dromedarius]

You could go from having 1 great keeper, a decent keeper and some solid role players to having 2 decent keepers.

What???  :blink:  What about those of us stuck with two "decent" keepers, because we didn't get to draft at the top? Should we be penalized forever, so that players who drafted first don't have to adjust?

Besides, I'm going to go from five keepers to two, with no help in the draft, do you feel sorry for me? Incidentally, none of my keepers comes close to Garnett or McGrady. I think you're missing the point, which is: If managers can keep players forever, the first draft takes on more importance than the rest for the forseeable future.

I'm okay with having to restructure my team, as long as other owners have to restructure their team from time to time as well. Managers with a Lebron James or Tim Duncan don't have to as it stands now. They simply build around what they have, because these guys are going to be stars for the next DECADE.

What this would do is keep them on their toes in the future, having to make good trades and sound draft picks. I don't have the option of either, because I can't build around Jason Kidd or Ben Wallace (in a shooter league), and I can't deal them. That sounds pretty unfair...