Houston would have moved past New Orleans, Denver, Golden State, Phoenix and Dallas at least this year. They were easily on par with Jazz, Lakers and Spurs, before Yao's injury. The notion that they would go just as far if not farther with Mutombo at center as opposed to Yao at center is absurd.
Would the Jazz make the conference semi's without Boozer?
Would the Lakers make the conference semi's without Kobe?
Would SA make the conference semi's without Duncan?
Would NO make the conference semi's without Paul?
Would Denver make the conference semi's without Anthony, Iverson or Camby?
Would GS make the conference semi's without Davis?
Would the Suns make the conference semi's without Nash?
Would Dallas make the conference semi's without Dirk?
lol -- sorry, I don't buy that the Rockets were on the same level as the Lakers, Spurs and Jazz. I never said that the Rockets would make it to the conference semi's without Yao -- I don't think they would make the conference semi's WITH Yao. Personally, I think they can go as far without him as they would with him -- and that's a first round bounce unless they get lucky and play a bad team or a team with injuries. And I wasn't talking about replacing Yao with Mutombo -- perhaps you could go back and read my post and see what I was actually referring to trading for Yao.
I'm pretty amazed at your Yao comparisons: Yao = Kobe? Yao = Duncan? Yao isn't a superstar -- and while he may be on the same level as some of the players you mentioned, he certainly isn't the same as others you mentioned.
How about this question: How well would the prospective teams do without the particular star in regular games against playoff opponents?
Would the Jazz win without Boozer?
Would the Lakers win without Kobe?
Would SA win without Duncan?
Would NO win without Paul?
Would Denver win without Anthony, Iverson or Camby?
Would GS win without Davis?
Would the Suns win without Nash?
Would Dallas win without Dirk?
Would Houston win without Yao?