He also thought that Rodney Carney and Thadeus Young were error-prone.
I've been incredibly impressed with Thad. He's a very, very smart 19 year old basketball player. His skills are still developing (but not devoid), but give me a kid with his basketball IQ, his athleticism, and his work ethic, and I'm pretty confident he's going to make it in this league. I haven't seen a 19 year old rotate as well as he does, both offensively and defensively, moving without the ball, rotating defensively, setting screens, etc in a while.
I also disagree with him about moving Dalembert instead of Miller. I'm not a huge fan of Dalembert, and in fact I'd end up looking to move both. But if I had to look to move one or the other, and could only move one, I'd move Miller. The Sixers are not close to contender status, and Miller's age and contract status (would he want to re-sign here on a team rebuilding?) makes me think we should get value for him now. That and the fact that I want to see what Williams can do at the PG spot to try to assess our needs for the future.
The Sixers have more three's than they know what to do with- the mistake that Billy King kept making was drafting the same guy! Why Thad Young over Al Horford?
Since you've already clarified that it's Thornton, I ask what do you think Thornton brings that this team needs? Thornton's another wing player, who's shown no discernible skill other than scoring. He doesn't rebound well, and has an eddy curry'esque line of nearly as many turnovers (0.96) as assists, steals and blocks combined (1.0). He's not a post player (nearly 76% of his attempts are on jump shots), he can't defend power forwards, and he doesn't rebound at all.
In fact, I think Young may have more of a chance to be a power forward than Thornton. Young actually measured in taller than Thornton at the predraft camp (young was 6'7.5", thornton 6'7"), and that's with Young only being 18 at the time (and could very well still be growing). More importantly, Young had a longer standing reach by 2 inches, and was stronger as well.
More importantly, looking at skillset, Young's displayed a very good ability to finish around the hoop, and has shown post up, rebounding, and shotblocking skills as well.
Last but not least, Thornton's a 23 year old who has very little ability to every develop anything but his scoring, whereas Young's 19 and just beginning to tap his potential.
I'm just curious why you think Thornton's skillset is more needed than Young's, and why Young is the same guy as Rodney Carney, but Thornton is different. In fact, I think Carney is more redundant with Thornton than he is with Young. I've been very pleasantly surprised with Young, and I don't know how you can call this a mistake. If you want a mistake, passing on Ronnie Brewer for Rodney Carney was a huge mistake. But Young looks to be a fixture of this team in my opinion.