I don't understand the appeal of LA when it comes to putting a *third* team there.
The Lakers already rule the entire REGION, not just the city, and a third team would simply saturate the market.
The Kings aren't a good team, and as Koast points out, would have to fight the Clippers for what few non-Laker fans there are.
What's the deal with this move? Why would Stern allow it?
Let me just play the other side for a minute here....tho we are on the same page for the most part, outside of my lazy desire to drive 2 miles from work to see pro basketball
we fully agree.
As far as Los Angeles and Orange County residents are concerned, we don't like to drive to each others 'area'. People from LA don't like to come down to Orange County if they don't have to and those of us in Orange County don't like to go up to LA if we don't have to. I wouldn't call it resentment or hate from either area but we live where we live. The LA people think OC is boring and too 'cookie cutter' and people in OC hate the LA traffic and think its 'dirty'. So to have a team in Orange County and one in LA, isn't all that crazy of an idea. There is close to 4 million people living in Orange County currently with another large chunk of 'tourists' who come to the area for Disneyland, the beach, and Surf City USA.
The NBA has wanted a team to go up into Orange County for a while now because it is still a 4 million person market. God knows how many people have tried to convince the Clippers to move to Anaheim, play at the Honda Center, yet still be a 'Los Angeles' team in name. It seems like just about every couple of years the idea gets flirted with where the Clippers will play a few home games up here or someone will mention the idea of them becoming the Orange County team.
To my knowledge the other owners have the power to block it but Stern does not directly. I could be wrong but I think that is how this works. The league has input but the owners are the deciding factor via votes.