This one is too near and dear to my heart for me to pass up commenting on it.
The biggest reason Malone doesn't have a title in Utah is KARL MALONE.
In the championship serieses against Chicago, Malone settled for long-range jumper after long-range jumper. Because of Rodman's defense? No. Because - the first time around, Malone was trying to prove he deserved the MVP trophy he had been awarded, and the second time around, he was trying to prove people were wrong about the first time around. It wasn't Rodman's defense - it was the defense of BRIAN WILLIAMS that affected Malone more. Malone didn't cut to the lane off of pick-and-rolls - he broke to the outside, over, and over, and over - with Skander and me screaming about it the entire time.
It wasn't Karl Malone's jumper that is the threat - it's the fact that he might go strong to the basket; draw a foul; get your players in foul trouble, bruise them up, or put the fear into them of getting in his way again; and hit a high percentage of shots. But Malone kept insisting that it was the game plan for him to shoot outside.
Malone abandoned his strengths to try to compete against public perception...and he lost. It wasn't a last-minute steal or anything of Malone "choking in the clutch." The problem was FAR more serious. Karl Malone abandoned the type of game that got Utah there in the first place. It wasn't "choking," it was just plain trying to do things that you can't do.
If Shaquille O'Neal abandons his post game for hoisting up three-pointers, the Lakers will lose if they keep putting the ball in the hands of Shaq, and they'll lose if they use Shaq to get other people open. Teams live and die by the game they typically play, and if they abandon it, bad things happen. One only needs to look at Karl Malone's performance in the two finals to see that.