I say:
I personally believe that whether the coach is racist or not is a complete SIDE issue.
This comment is followed by:
Derek:
So because he's upset he was late, he's a racist?
JoMal:
I consider Dabod's opinion the crux of the matter, and westkoast' inference that the man is a racist as well.
jemagee:
The coach isn't a racist moron, he's just a moron
WayOutWest:
I loved Will Smith's movie, "Wild, Wild West"
Am I here? Do I exist?
I think that's everyone's way of saying, "I disagree."
And, so it's said, I disagree. Whether the coach is a racist or not is *NOT* a side issue, but is fundamental to the equation. If the INTENT was racist, then there's a huge problem. If the INTENT was NOT racist, then the problem becomes one of communication and trust.
Even you yourself said that it's a different situation when it's a friend joking around versus a stranger hurling an insult. This, to me, is the CRITICAL issue. As a coach, YOU ARE A PART OF THE TEAM. There is a certain level of implied trust. A major part of that level of trust is that the coach HAD BETTER NOT BE a racist; a racist coach is by definition a failure. If he is, by working with the player at all, he's being hypocritcal, and as a result, he cannot be trusted by the team, because he's hiding an agenda. In equal measure, a player MUST NOT be walking around with a chip on his shoulder, because if he is, HE'S hiding an agenda, and, just as the coach in the previous example, HE cannot be trusted.
The reaction of the OTHER players is EXTREMELY telling. If the coach stepped out-of-line, part of the responsiblity of the team AND ESPECIALLY THE TEAM CAPTAINS/LEADERS is to let the coach know he's stepped out-of-line. A strong team keeps that all in-house. And it says something about the player in that he DIDN'T go to his coach, DIDN'T go to the assistant coaches, DIDN'T go to his fellow players, DIDN'T go to the team captains, but ran home to Mama. I said it before, and I'll say it again: the kid should never have been on the team. He does not have the requisite level of trust.
I also have to admit that "It happened 2000 years ago versus 50 years ago" means precious little to me, because most of the people posting that WEREN'T EVEN ALIVE 50 years ago. Heck, *I* wasn't alive 50 years ago. If it's not a part of what is commonplace during my lifetime, I'm not going to take it seriously. Otherwise, the obvious question becomes "How many years do we have to wait?" 100? 250? 1000?
JoMal's point about a kid being upset by being referred to as one of several "boys" is the ultimate example of political correctness run amok. Makes you want to reply, "Grow up, kid, and then you can be offended."
Let's just look at Ted on the board as an example of the idea of TRUST. How many Mormon jokes have been made on here? If he wanted to be offended every time, he's certainly well within his right. How many of us has he actually met - to see UP CLOSE whether the jokes are in fun, or actually someone being classless?
If a person who has NEVER MET YOU can have a sense of humor regarding something VERY PERSONAL, then there needs to be a bit more understanding between a COACH and HIS PLAYER.