I've been a bit on the fence about spending all our cap on Smith, but I think I'm now fully on board. This is X-post from what I posted on Real-GM (actually some good stuff their tonight.) No real original thoughts, just trying to picture some line-ups/rotations...
I think with JSmith, Skates' point about him fitting in better now that we drafted Speights sways me to be in favor of signing him. Worst case, we have a young, valuable talent added but still a big hole in the low block- we could always move Thad/Iguodala/Smith later for a post player when the right one is available. You can never have too much young talent, and the minutes are there to keep everyone happy, even if the lack of low post scoring limits the teams ceiling.
With Smith, team success will depend on whether Thad and Speights develop into legit post threats.
Best case, Thad and Speights develop into formidable low post weapons. Thad as a SF/PF, and Speights as a PF/C. One can be on the court at all times, and you just mix in Smith/Sam/Iguodala. There are plenty of minutes to keep everyone happy, and you would always have some post scoring and great athleticism on the floor.
Here are some line-ups (PG excluded)
Iguodala-Thad-Smith-Sam
Lou-SF-Speights-Sam (Sf=Iguodala, Young or Smith)
Iguodala-Thad-Smith-Speights
Shooting is a bit weak for every line-up. we would need to find a great shooting PG (Hinrich?). But every line-up has defense, rebounding, post play and crazy athletes. Plus we can vary size
for match-ups going big or small. I also am optomistic that next to a good shooting PG, Thad, Iguodala, Lou, Smith, Speights and Sam all can be decent to good jump shooters- at least enough to be a threat. Other than Sam and Smith, I think they all make good choices about when to shoot and pass.