Author Topic: Sixers vs. Spurs Saturday Night.  (Read 6106 times)

Offline Skandery

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1710
    • MSN Messenger - skandery27@hotmail.com
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Sixers vs. Spurs Saturday Night.
« Reply #30 on: March 17, 2008, 11:31:44 AM »
WayOutWest for President!!

=======================

If you put a mousetrap into a blender and it doesn't function correctly afterward, doesn't mean species were created separately and distinctly.

There's my one . . .
"But guys like us, we don't pay attention to the polls. We know that polls are just a collection of statistics that reflect what people are thinking in 'reality'. And reality has a well-known liberal bias."

Offline Reality

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8738
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Sixers vs. Spurs Saturday Night.
« Reply #31 on: March 17, 2008, 11:45:33 AM »
Right.  But if you take a watch with over 300 parts, seperate the parts and put them in a box and shake them for 100,000,000 years, it will automatically assemble itself and begin working correctly.

Offline Laker Fan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1255
    • View Profile
Re: Sixers vs. Spurs Saturday Night.
« Reply #32 on: March 17, 2008, 11:49:50 AM »
Depending on the seedings they should get to the 2nd round.  They are playing at a higher level now than every E.C. team with the exception of Boston (9-1) and Orlando (8-2).  And, no matter how many games Orlando wins, it still won't get that bad taste of loosing to the Sixers out of their mouths.
I also don't go for ebonics.  "they Sixers" is not even close to proper English.

The difference between the Sixers and the teams you look upon more favorably, is that they have been winning all year, while the Sixers haven't been playing good ball for more than 25 games.

AS far as playoff experience goes, apart from Detroit and Cleveland, none of the other teams have much at all.

5 sport.

Not only that, but they have been defeating good teams all the way.

Orlando, Dallas, Phoenix, Detroit, San Antonio....  The 4 western teams are all playoff teams and are SUPPOSSED to be head and shoulders above the East.

handle Bostons's defense

match - up




I likewise devalue the opinions of those lacking proper command of the English language Rick, allow me to point out some glaring examples.

Ebonics is a proper name hence it requires proper name capitalization.
A comma is improper after favorably as it is a continuation of thought in the flow of the sentence.
"AS" should be As, no need for the upper case 'S'.
It should have been spelled '5 spot', not "5 sport".
"Not only that, but they have been defeating good teams all the way." should have been structured this way: "Not only that, but they have been defeating good teams ALONG the way."
If you are not quoting someone, an ellipsis does not belong after San Antonio, and an ellipsis consists of 3 evenly spaced periods, not 4.
It is "Boston's", not "Bostons's".
Spacing before or after the dash in "match - up" is incorrect, and are inconsistent with your not including the spacing in "line-up".

And as an aside to this post, your continually using the word 'loose' when referring to a team's defeat is incorrect, teams do not 'loose' games, they LOSE games.

I could easily spend more time picking apart the actual sentence structure in the here quoted post, but I simply cannot take anyone seriously who demonstrates such a poor command of the English language.
« Last Edit: March 17, 2008, 11:57:27 AM by Laker Fan »
Dan

Offline rickortreat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2056
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Sixers vs. Spurs Saturday Night.
« Reply #33 on: March 17, 2008, 12:04:21 PM »
Depending on the seedings they should get to the 2nd round.  They are playing at a higher level now than every E.C. team with the exception of Boston (9-1) and Orlando (8-2).  And, no matter how many games Orlando wins, it still won't get that bad taste of loosing to the Sixers out of their mouths.
I also don't go for ebonics.  "they Sixers" is not even close to proper English.

The difference between the Sixers and the teams you look upon more favorably, is that they have been winning all year, while the Sixers haven't been playing good ball for more than 25 games.

AS far as playoff experience goes, apart from Detroit and Cleveland, none of the other teams have much at all.

5 sport.

Not only that, but they have been defeating good teams all the way.

Orlando, Dallas, Phoenix, Detroit, San Antonio....  The 4 western teams are all playoff teams and are SUPPOSSED to be head and shoulders above the East.

handle Bostons's defense

match - up




I likewise devalue the opinions of those lacking proper command of the English language Rick, allow me to point out some glaring examples.

Ebonics is a proper name hence it requires proper name capitalization.
A comma is improper after favorably as it is a continuation of thought in the flow of the sentence.
"AS" should be As, no need for the upper case 'S'.
It should have been spelled '5 spot', not "5 sport".
"Not only that, but they have been defeating good teams all the way." should have been structured this way: "Not only that, but they have been defeating good teams ALONG the way."
If you are not quoting someone, an ellipsis does not belong after San Antonio, and an ellipsis consists of 3 evenly spaced periods, not 4.
It is "Boston's", not "Bostons's".
Spacing before or after the dash in "match - up" is incorrect, and are inconsistent with your not including the spacing in "line-up".

And as an aside to this post, your continually using the word 'loose' when referring to a team's defeat is incorrect, teams do not 'loose' games, they LOSE games.

I could easily spend more time picking apart the actual sentence structure in the here quoted post, but I simply cannot take anyone seriously who demonstrates such a poor command of the English language.



 ;D

Offline WayOutWest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7411
    • View Profile
Re: Sixers vs. Spurs Saturday Night.
« Reply #34 on: March 17, 2008, 12:38:31 PM »
Exactly.  Which is why Teds making up and/or citing some goofball false religions claim does not disprove creation anymore then my choosing one goofball *scientific* study disproves all other scientific studies attempting to prove evolution.

We could attempt to choose a specific subject, like carbon dating or "mutations", but if it's just going to be a debate with no discussion, is there any point?

I guess my point was lost.   ::)

Intelligent design is the latest flavor of creationalism and they still take great leaps to get the ball rolling and that just doesn't hold water using the scientific method.  You cannot use a "given" unless that "given" can be proven in addition to not being disprovable.  Nobody can prove that "God" is NOT an alien but that doesn't make it true since I cannot prove it either.  Same goes for creationalism.
"History shouldn't be a mystery"
"Our story is real history"
"Not his story"

"My people's culture was strong, it was pure"
"And if not for that white greed"
"It would've endured"

"Laker hate causes blindness"

Offline Reality

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8738
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Sixers vs. Spurs Saturday Night.
« Reply #35 on: March 17, 2008, 12:42:21 PM »
I guess my point was lost.   ::)

Intelligent design is the latest flavor of creationalism and they still take great leaps to get the ball rolling and that just doesn't hold water using the scientific method. 
I do not espouse any "latest flavor" of either creationism or evolutionism.
What exact point about an intelligent designer creating does not hold water?

Offline WayOutWest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7411
    • View Profile
Re: Sixers vs. Spurs Saturday Night.
« Reply #36 on: March 17, 2008, 01:05:04 PM »
I guess my point was lost.   ::)

Intelligent design is the latest flavor of creationalism and they still take great leaps to get the ball rolling and that just doesn't hold water using the scientific method. 
I do not espouse any "latest flavor" of either creationism or evolutionism.
What exact point about an intelligent designer creating does not hold water?

Proof that he/she exists.  I don't buy "it couldn't happen without him/her" argument. 

"evolution" on the other hand has SUPPORTING proof and there is no CONTRADICTORY proof.  "Evolution" on the other hand is missing some SUPPORTING proof but there is no CONTRADICTORY proof either.  Intelligent design and/or creationalism is lacking supporting proof.  We have examples of simple organism evolving into more complex ones.  We have examples of ogranisms, whales and their hips, evolving to better suit their enviroments.  Is it possible that "evolution" was part of the intelligent design?  Yes.  Is there proof? No.
"History shouldn't be a mystery"
"Our story is real history"
"Not his story"

"My people's culture was strong, it was pure"
"And if not for that white greed"
"It would've endured"

"Laker hate causes blindness"

Offline Skandery

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1710
    • MSN Messenger - skandery27@hotmail.com
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Sixers vs. Spurs Saturday Night.
« Reply #37 on: March 17, 2008, 01:19:30 PM »
Goodness but WOW is in ridiculous form today. 

Hip, Hip, Huzzah . . . ole' chap.
"But guys like us, we don't pay attention to the polls. We know that polls are just a collection of statistics that reflect what people are thinking in 'reality'. And reality has a well-known liberal bias."

Offline Ted

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1468
    • AOL Instant Messenger - Rustedhart
    • Yahoo Instant Messenger - ruteha
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Sixers vs. Spurs Saturday Night.
« Reply #38 on: March 17, 2008, 02:34:36 PM »
Goodness but WOW is in ridiculous form today. 

Hip, Hip, Huzzah . . . ole' chap.


That's not WoW. It's got to be one of his kids posting under his name. It's got to be.
"You take him Perk!" ~Kevin Garnett

"I think the responsibility the Democrats have may rest more in resisting any efforts by Republicans in the Congress or by me when I was President to put some standards in and tighten up a little bit on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac." ~Bill Clinton

Offline westkoast

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8624
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Sixers vs. Spurs Saturday Night.
« Reply #39 on: March 17, 2008, 02:42:40 PM »
Goodness but WOW is in ridiculous form today. 

Hip, Hip, Huzzah . . . ole' chap.


That's not WoW. It's got to be one of his kids posting under his name. It's got to be.

lol @ him shaking off the old factor cuz he plays Halo 3 with a bunch of young kids.

WOW is cool now.  Not Johnny Carson cool either.  More like Pitbull the rapper cool.  AYE CHICO.
http://I-Really-Shouldn't-Put-A-Link-To-A-Blog-I-Dont-Even-Update.com

Offline WayOutWest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7411
    • View Profile
Re: Sixers vs. Spurs Saturday Night.
« Reply #40 on: March 17, 2008, 10:31:00 PM »
Goodness but WOW is in ridiculous form today. 

Hip, Hip, Huzzah . . . ole' chap.


That's not WoW. It's got to be one of his kids posting under his name. It's got to be.

lol @ him shaking off the old factor cuz he plays Halo 3 with a bunch of young kids.

WOW is cool now.  Not Johnny Carson cool either.  More like Pitbull the rapper cool.  AYE CHICO.

At least it's not "Big Bang Theory" cool.  I didn't think that show would last but it's on right now.
"History shouldn't be a mystery"
"Our story is real history"
"Not his story"

"My people's culture was strong, it was pure"
"And if not for that white greed"
"It would've endured"

"Laker hate causes blindness"