WayOut,
I think the operative words there are "The Clippers." There's a reason that franchise has long been a joke, and it starts with the fact that the owner doesn't want to compete.
The fact is that Kobe feels that the Lakers' front office doesn't want to compete. The problem that I see is that he'll say that about any team he goes to, since the only way the Lakers would agree to the trade is if the team getting Kobe guts itself in order to get him.
Consider this possibility; Miami won a championship two seasons back. Would Kobe go to Miami in exchange for Dwyane Wade plus salary, knowing that that salary will entail some of the players who make Miami what it is? And will he be happy there once Alonzo and Shaq retire, and he has to go through the rebuilding phase? In such a case, is he really that much better off than he is right now?
The kind of team that will trade for Kobe is a team that thinks it is missing a piece - someone like Bryant - and that its window is *NOW* rather than the FUTURE. You don't trade for Bryant to win 4 years down the road; you trade for him to win *NOW*. In addition, the team has to believe that it has enough to give up to get Bryant and *STILL* be in the hunt. So, essentially, you're talking an elite-level team.
LA needs to do what Boston just did. The problem is that they don't have the young talent that Boston had to do it with.
If you want to keep Bryant happy, you have to do something along the line of asking Indiana what it will take to get Jermaine O'Neal, and when they tell you, just pull the trigger. If you're not the one trading away the bigger name, you're not the one who gets to set the terms. The Lakers are not going to get to set the terms for getting help for Bryant.
And I'm not sure that with Bryant publicly unhappy and the team needing to make a move that a team that is interested in getting Bryant will allow the Lakers to dictate the terms, as they normally would.