Calling Duncan gutless because guards aren't putting the ball in his hands at the end of a game is no different that calling Shaq gutless for the same thing in last year's Finals against Detroit. Shaq was absolutely *GUTLESS*, because he didn't have the ball in his hands at the end of the game. Same thing this year in Miami.
It's easier to apply the label to Duncan because he doesn't blast his teammates in the paper afterward.
Ball distribution is the job of the guards. It's easier to call a Ginobilli or a Parker (or a Bryant, etc.) a player with "heart" because they've got the ball in their hands. It's not Duncan's fault for getting limited looks. It's the fault of the guards.
No one was calling Duncan gutless when he hit what looked to be a game-winner, leaving .4 seconds on the clock against the Lakers in Game 5 last year. At that point, they called him "clutch."
To say Duncan shouldn't be mentioned in the same breat as Magic, Bird, Jordan, or West - I can call that reasonable. HORRY? NO. Horry makes plays here and there, and does a lot of the little things, I admit - but Duncan does even more of those things - as evidenced by his stat line over and over and over and over again. HORRY can't be mentioned in the same breath as DUNCAN.
Unless, of course, you're willing to say things like "Duncan can't be mentioned in the same breath as Avery Johnson, Jaren Jackson, Steve Kerr, Brian Shaw, Derek Fisher, Sean Elliott, and Nick Van Exel."