So is your favoritism towards him. Which one of us would you say is the one who has really been viewing Bryant through rose colored glasses?
--I am bias towards Kobe, Hes my favorite player. Thats a given. Ive admitted that. The difference between us? I at least *try* to be objective.
While Kobe has a good game, I have never thought much of his attitude about getting advice, whether it has come from a nonentity like Phil Jackson about Bryant being more of a team player, or listening to advisors regarding his public statements about his trial in Colorado.
--Obviously he did take advice or they never would have won. Is he hard headed? Very much so.
Did Shaq contribute to the problems regarding Kobe? Well, to use your own line of logic against you, how come O'Neal didnt have comflicts the first few seasons with anyone in Orlando? How come no one is having any conflicts with him in Miami? And to stretch this a bit further, how did Karl Malone, Chucky Atkins, Lamar Odom, Gary Payton, Derek Fisher, etal get along with Kobe? Anyone listed here join Shaq as publically stating that they were, shall we say, "disgruntled" with Kobe, for any reason?
--Uhh JoMaL, Shaq and Penny had major problems. How come no one is having conflicts with him in Miami? Because they dont have a second super star, yet. Shaq has already admitted to him not doing what he should of with Penny/Kobe and said he wont make the same mistake with Wade. He can admit it, yet you still cant see it.
Now, please name those players other then Kobe who have had a public feud with Shaq.
--Penny, that was a gimmie.
If you could put any 20-30 players with Shaq at the two guard then how come he didnt win the first few seasons with LA and how come he didnt win in Orlando at all? Miami is doing well because Wade, just like Kobe, makes the load on Shaq a heck of alot less. They both dominate the perimeter. There is not 20-30 players in this league that can dominate the backcourt like that. There is like 4.
Didn't Shaq get to the championship round while in Orlando with Penny Hardaway? They didn't win, but then, how many years did Shaq and Bryant play together in LA before they won - after Phil Jackson showed up and told Shaq, at least, how to do it. He told Kobe too, but Kobe probably blew him off, as always. Which just goes and makes my point all over again. Jaskson + Shaq + (Name support player of your choice here) = championship.
--Yes they did and what happend? They lost. Uhh a few, while Kobe was still developing his game. Once he started to pick up the game PJ showed up and took it to the next level. He came straight from high school remember? Kobe just blew him off yet he turned into the best perimeter player in the game under PJ :lol: Not any support player could have played and you know it. Still bitter from the year Kobe took you guys out of the playoffs?
Now, in Miami, you have Shaq + Wade + (have you
SEEN who else is playing on the Heat lately? YEEEECCHHH!!!!) may get another Shaq team to the championship round. Here is a little hint about that. They won't be playing the Lakers led by Kobe Bryant. Not this year, not next year, not before Shaq has put his size 23's up on a cushion after ten years of retirement.
--Didnt know that players like Eddie Jones, Steve Smith, Laetner, were such horrible horrible supporting players that dont help out at all.
Who had the heroic overtime against the Pacers in the finals when Shaq was on the bench that sealed the deal? Who torched Minny last year to swing the momentum is the Lakers favor? Who made the play that sealed the deal for Portland that first year?  Who consistantly torched YOUR Kings and the Spurs on the road during the three-peat? Kobe HANDLED teams on the road and Shaq dominated at home. Surely your memory is not that shot JoMaL. It wasnt that long ago when the Lakers swept the Kings and Kobe had back to back games where he just destroyed the Kings. To say ANY 2-guard could team up with Shaq and win 3 championships is a joke.
Shaq opened up opportunities for Kobe, not the other way around. Teams prepared for O'Neal, not for Kobe. Team's offenses got stymied because of Shaq, not because of Bryant. If Kobe was able to produce so effectively in those games you mentioned, give the real reason.
--Kobe never helped Shaq out? Did someone steal JoMaL's password? You are one of the most intelligent basketball posters on the board and you still think Shaq did not benefit from Kobe? The triangle didnt help either I guess. The triangle never got anyone shots for the Lakers. I dont deny Shaq made it easier for him but to say Shaq didnt benefit from a dominate outside player is not true. The triangle also gives alot of players shots, Shaq or not. Ask BJ Armstrong, Paxton, and Steve Kerr.
At times, Allan Iverson has singlehandedly won games, as have Paul Pierce, Tracy McGrady, Chris Webber, Mike Bibby, Ray Allen, Stephon Marbury, Jason Kidd, and I don't think I need to list the 20 or 30 other players who have accomplished the feat just like Kobe has. They all have also failed in crunch time at various rates, none quite as often as Kobe, but that is fodder for another thread.
--What does this have to do with anything? Plenty of players win games for their teams by themselves. I watched a Clipper scrub come off the bench and get 4 huge dunks, block 2 shots, and snatch 3 rebounds to win the game for them. How many of those guys have won big playoffs games single handly? How many of those guys have won games in the finals? Bibby...AI....uhh thats it. Kidd doesnt win games himself seeing how he dominates by passing. Marbury? I guess that one shot in PHX against the Spurs counts. Allen? Webber? You are comparing one and two times in the playoffs to 4 years of KILLING teams in the playoffs.
But none of those others have benefitted as much as Bryant has by by having opposing teams constantly keeping one eye glued to Shaquille O'Neal lurking in the paint. Other big men have talent and poise and are dangerous, but O'Neal dominates like no other. If the ball gets in to him, they know they have no chance at all. Kobe exploited that on occasion. I should hope so. More importantly, it affected how Kobe would be guarded. It made Kobe believe it was all him doing it, and Shaq was just in the way, somehow. Now, he is going to learn the truth. See how he does in those tight situations without having an O'Neal on your team.
--Again with the bias...on occasion :lol: They won 3 championships JoMaL. How many times did Kobe exploit the Kings by using Shaq? Kobe was the person on the Laker squad who passed the ball the most to Shaq. Where have you been? Thats an olddddd stat. Kobe didnt believe he did it all himself. Thats JoMaL trying to put thoughts into Kobe's head via a message board.
A few more years of possible championships versus a lot more years of Kobe.
Lakers with Shaq still on the team = :bounce:
Lakers with Kobe for the next decade = :cry:
I am real glad you won't mind, because the rest of us sure are glad to see Shaq in Miami!!!
--A few more years of championships? No. For the simple fact that Shaq wouldnt have someone on the perimeter to help him out. Do you forget you are talking to someone who watched Shaq every night when he was inbetween all-star perimeter players? Lakers didnt dominate with Shaq until after Kobe matured and PJ installed the triangle. What makes you think an older, less motivated Shaq woul dhave done better than when he first came to LA?
Im not happy hes in Miami but im not bummed out either because he is not going to be in this league forever. Its either stay with out of shape Shaq for a few more years and let Kobe go. Or deal with rebuilding for a few years until the Lakers can pull some players that compliment Kobe? Lakers would have made the playoffs this year if it wasnt for the fact that they put the triangle in mid-season. Thats with a unit that hasnt played together with only 5 returning players from last year and a coach who left! The Lakers suck but to say its all Kobe's fault isnt true. You are one of those people who have hated Kobe for the longest time but didnt want to look like a 'hater' now you have something to hate him for!