Author Topic: Good Article from Jack Welch  (Read 5303 times)

Offline Ted

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1468
    • AOL Instant Messenger - Rustedhart
    • Yahoo Instant Messenger - ruteha
    • View Profile
    • Email
Good Article from Jack Welch
« on: October 28, 2004, 01:31:34 PM »
Five Questions to Ask . . .

By JACK WELCH
October 28, 2004; Page A14

In five days, America votes not for its president, but for its leader. I make that distinction because rarely in American history has the occupant of the White House had such a burden of leadership to bear. We are in a war to protect our very way of life, and it is a brand new kind of war, with no foreseeable end and enemies as evil as they are invisible. And our economy -- the engine of freedom and opportunity around the world -- faces daunting challenges from within our borders and without.

Because of these twin threats to our security and our prosperity, the leader we are about to elect holds the future in his hands -- our future, our children's, and their children's. That is why, as you approach the voting booth on Tuesday, you need to think less about politics and policies and more about the characteristics that define a great leader in tough and perilous times.

I'm not saying America has not faced huge challenges before. We have survived several wars and countless economic downturns. But we have done so with varying degrees of speed and fortitude. In the late 1970s, the Carter administration's policies had so damaged the economy that the president himself declared the country in a "state of malaise." It was really tough -- I remember it well because I had just been named the CEO of GE in 1980. The Cold War raged. Unemployment was over 7%, inflation was at 13%, and the prime rate reached 20%. Japan had been declared the next industrial global power. Obituaries were being written for companies like ours.

Ronald Reagan was elected into this environment. He did not declare the country in malaise, but painted a picture of a bright and thriving tomorrow, and then led the country there, through a series of largely unpopular moves. He refused to capitulate to striking air-traffic controllers, pushed through sweeping tax cuts, and faced down Communism by heavily building up the military. The peace and prosperity he created lasted for 20 years.

The next leader of the United States needs Ronald Reagan's optimism, courage, and conviction, but with a fiercer enemy, he will need to be a leader for the ages -- a leader in the extreme.

So, who is that man -- John Kerry or George Bush? That is a decision all voters must answer for themselves on Tuesday.

But how? Below are five questions that you might consider before pulling the lever. Each one gets at the unique qualities that, from my experience, define a great leader in tough times. Those qualities may not be what we will be looking for in a president in five years or ten, but what we need today from the man who will be remembered for saving America, or breaking it.

Is He Real?

What a crazy question, right? But authenticity really matters when it comes to crisis leadership. A person cannot make hard decisions, hold unpopular positions, or stand tall for what he believes unless he knows who he is and feels comfortable in his own skin. I am talking about self-confidence and conviction. These traits make a leader bold and decisive, which is absolutely critical in times where you must act quickly, often without complete information. Just as important, authenticity makes a leader likeable, for lack of a better word. His "realness" comes across in the way he communicates and reaches people on an emotional level. His words move them; his message touches something inside.

When I was at GE, we would occasionally encounter a very successful executive who just could not be promoted to the next level. In the early days, we would struggle with our reasoning. The person demonstrated the right values and made the numbers, but usually his people did not connect with him. What was wrong? Finally, we figured out that these people always had a certain phoniness about them. They pretended to be something they were not -- more in control, more upbeat, more savvy than they really were. They didn't sweat. They didn't cry. They squirmed in their own skin, playing a role of their own inventing.

A leader in times of crisis can't have an iota of fakeness in him. He has to know himself -- and like himself -- so that he can be straight with the world, energize his followers, and lead with the authority born of authenticity.

Does He See Around Corners?

Every leader has to have a vision and predict the future, of course, but great leaders in tough times must have a special ability to anticipate the radically unexpected. In business, the best leaders in brutally competitive environments have a "sixth sense" for market changes, as well as moves by existing competitors and new entrants. For the next president in our new world, a "sixth sense" is not enough. He needs a seventh sense -- paranoia about what lurks in dark corners we cannot even see.

If this sounds overdramatic, consider the cost of not having this trait. Consider September 11. There had been the first bombing of the World Trade Center in 1993, the African embassy bombings in 1998, and the attack on the USS Cole two years later. But two terms of the Clinton administration and nine months of the incumbent's did not have the imagination to see what was ahead. Who could have? Now we know the leader of our country must have that ability, as dark and horrifying as the "vision" might be.

Who's Around Him?

In tough times in particular, a leader needs to surround himself with people who are smarter than he is, and they must have the grit to disagree with him and each other.

Every time we had a crisis at GE, I would quickly assemble a group of the smartest, gutsiest people I could find at any level from within the company and sometimes without, and lean on them heavily for their knowledge and advice. I would make sure everyone in the room came at the problem from a different angle, and then I would have us all wallow in the information as we worked to solve the crisis. These sessions were almost always contentious, and the opinions that came at me strong and varied. And yet, my best decisions arose from what I learned in these debates. Disagreement surfaced meaningful questions and forced us to challenge assumptions. Everyone came out of the experience more informed and better prepared to take on the next crisis.

A great leader has the courage to put together a team of people who sometimes make him look like the dumbest person in the room! I know that sounds counterintuitive. You want your leader to be the smartest person in the room -- but if he acts like that, he won't get half the pushback he must get to make the best decisions.

Does He Get Back on the Horse?

Every leader makes mistakes, every leader stumbles and falls. The question is, does he learn from his mistakes, regroup, and then get going again with renewed speed, conviction, and confidence?

The name for this trait is resilience and it is so important that a leader must have it going in to a job because if he doesn't, a crisis time is too late to learn it. That is why, when I placed people in new leadership situations, I always looked for candidates who had one or two very tough experiences. I particularly liked the people who had had the wind knocked clear out of them, but proved they could run even harder in the next race.

The world around us is going to knock any leader off his horse more than once. He must know how to get back up in the saddle again.

Is He Pro-Business?

Last but not least, the leader of the United States must love business, because a thriving economy is the free world's last, best hope. It has become very fashionable in the past few years to say that business is bad and crooked. The anti-business fervor even got to the point that CEOs who outsourced production, in order to stay competitive, were labeled "Benedict Arnolds." What nonsense.

Business is great. Successful companies are the engine of a healthy society and nothing short of the foundation of a free and democratic world. While government is a key part of society and vital to all of us, it makes no money of its own. All the necessary things it provides -- from the justice system to welfare and hospitals -- come from some form of tax revenue paid by companies and their employees. Government is the support for the engine. It is not the engine.

A great leader in this day and age must appreciate the value of business to the world. He cannot beat it down, denigrate its participants, or create an environment where business people must struggle to build opportunity. When business is weak, America is weak.

* * *

On Tuesday, Americans vote in an election with stakes as high as we have ever seen. There is no perfect candidate, in this election or any. But there is a right man for the challenges we face in these tough times -- a right leader for this historic moment.

Before you pull that lever, ask yourself five questions and see where you come out.

Mr. Welch is former chairman and CEO of General Electric.
 
"You take him Perk!" ~Kevin Garnett

"I think the responsibility the Democrats have may rest more in resisting any efforts by Republicans in the Congress or by me when I was President to put some standards in and tighten up a little bit on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac." ~Bill Clinton

jn

  • Guest
Good Article from Jack Welch
« Reply #1 on: October 28, 2004, 02:51:15 PM »
Ummmm Ted, the absence of specific names or a direct endorsment does not make something non-partisan.  

Offline spursfan101

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1166
    • View Profile
    • http://
    • Email
Good Article from Jack Welch
« Reply #2 on: October 28, 2004, 03:12:15 PM »
This reminds me of the Southpark episode last night!

Did anybody see it?  Kyle had to cast his vote for the school mascot, it was either a Douche or a Piece of Crap.  He didn't like either choice, so he decided not to vote.

He was ostracized and kicked out of town because he forfeited his right to vote.  SouthPark, political satire with mentioning names! Gotta love it.
Paul

Offline Ted

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1468
    • AOL Instant Messenger - Rustedhart
    • Yahoo Instant Messenger - ruteha
    • View Profile
    • Email
Good Article from Jack Welch
« Reply #3 on: October 28, 2004, 03:30:47 PM »
Quote
Ummmm Ted, the absence of specific names or a direct endorsment does not make something non-partisan.
So you're saying you can apply these attributes to only one of the candidates?

I guess you have your choice then. At least according to Mr. Welch's criteria.
"You take him Perk!" ~Kevin Garnett

"I think the responsibility the Democrats have may rest more in resisting any efforts by Republicans in the Congress or by me when I was President to put some standards in and tighten up a little bit on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac." ~Bill Clinton

jn

  • Guest
Good Article from Jack Welch
« Reply #4 on: October 28, 2004, 04:06:52 PM »
No, I'm saying that most of his points, (though not all) mirror the propaganda put forth by the Republican party since Bush first ran.  He has constantly been promoted as man who is "comfortable in his own skin".  Much was made of how it didn't matter that he was less experienced in government because he surrounded himself with people like Cheney and Rummy.  

As for the "see around corners" bit you'll notice he ONLY mentions Democrat Clinton for failure to see into the future.  No mention of Republicans Reagan/Bush and their failure to see the blowback from helping arm Islamofascists in Afghanistan with weapons, training and even extremist Muslim literature.  No mention of Bush and the neo cons UNBELIEVABLE ability to see the current insurgency in Iraq coming.  

You'll also notice that in the "pro business" section he lifts a specific Kerry campaign line.


Think of it this way.  What if Bill Gates put out an article that said you should ask these questions of presidential candidates.

1.  Has he been willing to risk his PERSONAL safety to defend America? A person can't be a true leader until he has shown the willingness make the same sacrifices he may have ask other American's to.
2.  Is he able to communicate clearly?  A leader should be able to orate without having to depend on scripted questions and in general, use language in an eloquent manner.
3. Is the candidate willing to listen to criticism and look for important nuances that may counter his own beliefs?

Now Ted, would you call THAT  a non-partisan statement?
 

Offline Lurker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3705
    • View Profile
    • Email
Good Article from Jack Welch
« Reply #5 on: October 28, 2004, 04:12:06 PM »
I have to agree with jn on this one.  As I read through the list of questions I found myself definately leaning towards Bush as the correct answer.

And the only question I believe that Bush is the correct answer for is:

Which President did more to screw up America than any other?
It riles them to believe that you perceive the web they weave.  Keep on thinking free.
-Moody Blues

rickortreat

  • Guest
Good Article from Jack Welch
« Reply #6 on: October 28, 2004, 09:56:40 PM »
Welch is an asswipe.  That is the first thing you have to realize.  Of course he's for Bush, as all the greed-head asswipes are.

I worked for GE during his tenure, and although GE is a very disciplined well-run company, it is no longer primarily a manufacturing company, but a finance company.  I was on their help-desk supporting three divisions, none of which made anything.

I worked for their Captial/Modular Space division, which leased and sold trailers to businesses.  I also supported TIP international, a trucking firm, and NBC, the broadcasting company.

The thing that impressed me the most about GE was how they treated people.  The sales people were treated like dirt, they missed their quota for the month, they were out the door.  GE didn't invest in it's people, they used them up and spit them out.

If Bush was good for business, why did GE stop makeing stuff and morph into a financial service and finance company?  I'll tell you why- because you can't compete with a manufacturing business in the US. And, why is that? Because the Chinese and Japanese have fixed their currencies to ours, so matter how unbalanced our trade is with them,  they still continue to sell to us for less than we can make it ourselves- in short, they are subsidizing their labor force through currency arbitrage. This process has been going on for years and why our economy is dying- we're being sucked dry by the Asian economies.

 So Bush is not pro-business, at least in the US, he supports comanies that close plants here and open them in Asia.  This makes the businesses more profitable- but at the expense of the general US population.  

This alone is reason enough not to vote for Bush, though I've yet to see Kerry say anything to indicate he understands the root of the problem.  What is clear, however, is that GW has no intention of addressing the problem!

Oh yeah, and if he has that sense to see around dark corners, why were the twin towers brought down on his watch?   :eek2:  

Offline Joe Vancil

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2208
    • ICQ Messenger - 236778608
    • MSN Messenger - joev5638@hotmail.com
    • AOL Instant Messenger - GenghisThePBear
    • Yahoo Instant Messenger - joev5638
    • View Profile
    • http://www.joev.com
    • Email
Good Article from Jack Welch
« Reply #7 on: November 01, 2004, 10:09:55 AM »
Quote
But two terms of the Clinton administration and nine months of the incumbent's did not have the imagination to see what was ahead.

Sorry, Lurker, but doesn't this out-and-out criticize Bush?

Here's the criticism of the Republicans *AND* the Democrats.

For what it's worth, I AGREE with the article in its entirety, which is why I'm completely convinced that neither Bush nor Kerry should *EVER* be president.
 
« Last Edit: November 01, 2004, 10:11:15 AM by Joe Vancil »
Joe

-----------
Support your right to keep and arm bears!
Club (baby) seals, not sandwiches!

Offline Ted

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1468
    • AOL Instant Messenger - Rustedhart
    • Yahoo Instant Messenger - ruteha
    • View Profile
    • Email
Good Article from Jack Welch
« Reply #8 on: November 01, 2004, 11:12:10 AM »
Quote
For what it's worth, I AGREE with the article in its entirety, which is why I'm completely convinced that neither Bush nor Kerry should *EVER* be president.
Yeah, what Joe said.



People I'd vote for TODAY, over either of our two candidates:

John McCain (a leader, moderate Republican, hero, etc)

Colin Powell (a leader, unemotional, we wouldn't have gone to Iraq so soon if he'd been able to trump Wolfy and Dumsfeld)

Zell Miller (might be a little too angry for the job, but he's got cajones) ;)

Joe Lieberman (a demo with enough guts to stand up to Howard Dean)

Al Gore (just kidding)

Bill Bradley (This guy is my favorite demo of all time. I probably would have voted for him over GW. In his debates with Gore, I thought he was the clear winner. Spoke of substance and meaning, and all Gore ever said was, "I"m a fighter. I'll fight for the American people." Stupid lying Tennesseean buttmunch.)
"You take him Perk!" ~Kevin Garnett

"I think the responsibility the Democrats have may rest more in resisting any efforts by Republicans in the Congress or by me when I was President to put some standards in and tighten up a little bit on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac." ~Bill Clinton

Offline spursfan101

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1166
    • View Profile
    • http://
    • Email
Good Article from Jack Welch
« Reply #9 on: November 01, 2004, 01:33:24 PM »
Wish it were Howard Dean instead of Kerry. Too bad he was judged by one brief scream.
Paul

Offline ziggy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1990
    • Yahoo Instant Messenger - ziggythebeagle
    • View Profile
    • Email
Good Article from Jack Welch
« Reply #10 on: November 01, 2004, 03:12:34 PM »
Quote
Of course he's for Bush, as all the greed-head asswipes are.

If Bush was good for business, why did GE stop makeing stuff and morph into a financial service and finance company?  I'll tell you why- because you can't compete with a manufacturing business in the US. And, why is that? Because the Chinese and Japanese have fixed their currencies to ours, so matter how unbalanced our trade is with them,  they still continue to sell to us for less than we can make it ourselves- in short, they are subsidizing their labor force through currency arbitrage. This process has been going on for years and why our economy is dying- we're being sucked dry by the Asian economies.

So Bush is not pro-business, at least in the US, he supports comanies that close plants here and open them in Asia.  This makes the businesses more profitable- but at the expense of the general US population.  

This alone is reason enough not to vote for Bush, though I've yet to see Kerry say anything to indicate he understands the root of the problem.  What is clear, however, is that GW has no intention of addressing the problem!
 
Rick,
Since I voted for Bush, I guess that makes me, either an ignorant idiot or a greedhead asswipe.  So which one is it Rick?

With regards to the currency issue, the Yen has been floated on the international market for decades.  It is not fixed, and in fact was one of the first currencies to float.
The Remembi is fixed to the US$.  Has been FOREVER.  Bush has been pushing very hard to force the Chinese to float the Remembi, or repeg to a lower $ converatbility.  The Chinese won't do it because if they do the Chinese banking system very well may collapse, because it is holding huge amounts of bad debt foisted on it by the Chinese government.  Be all that as is it, Bush and his cabinent are pushing the Chinese hard, but it still comes to if the Chinese choose to re-peg or float.  The Bush admin has not made strong moves to support the US $ in the past 12 months, preferring to let it fall.  This has had 2 short term effects.  It has improved the climate for US exporters, while hurting importers, and it has caused significant inflationary pressures in China.  The Remembi is pegged to the $, so all Chinese imports are paid for in US$, and the US$ is weak, which has increased their cost to import.  This has created very high inflation in China, which is slowing economic growth.  If the Remembi was re-pegged, then they would have less inflation for imports, but their return on exports to the US would drop by the difference between the new and old pegged rates.  Either way the US is better off.


As far as GE becoming a financial services company, exactly when did that become the driving force in GE's business?  Did all of that happen in the last 3 years?  UHH NO!! This has been the path GE has been on for 30 years, and they are no different now than they were in the late 90's.  So exactly how did Bush's decision cause GE to Morph?  It happened 10 years before Bush even took office.
A third-rate mind is only happy when it is thinking with the majority. A second-rate mind is only happy when it is thinking with the minority. A first-rate mind is only happy when it is thinking.

A quotation is a handy thing to have about, saving one the trouble of thinking for oneself.

AA Mil

rickortreat

  • Guest
Good Article from Jack Welch
« Reply #11 on: November 02, 2004, 11:41:22 AM »
Well, you're certainly ignorant of the forex currency markets.  The Yen is free-tradeing on the market, true.  But what you don't understand is how they intervene in the market to control the level of their currency relative to the dollar.

The Japanese routinely purchase US treasuries with Yen, thus causing the value of the Yen to decline while pumping up the value of the Dollar.  The Fed than holds this debt paper in a custodial account for the Japanese.  The Chinese mechanism is remarkably simillar.  You can't simply say your currency is worth this much of another.  You may always offer to exchange it at that amount, but others aren't obligated to.  They will act on the basis of supply and demand, so China is forced to buy US treasuries to maintain that peg.

You say that Bush has been pressuring the Chinese?  That's pure crap.  If Bush wanted to get tough he could say "release the peg now or we will suspend all trade with China."

He hasn't done that, in fact he's bent over backwards and kissed China's ass!  You think N. Korea would be building nukes without China's support?  Bush is being played for a sucker.  

What China and Japan are doing is subsidizing their labor by maintaining their currency at an artificially low level, prefering to keep their populations employed.  They are sucking jobs out of America at an alarming rate, which is why we have lost millions of jobs under the Bush administration.  If Bush was concerned about keeping Americans employed he would have stopped China's peg years ago.  He's more concerned with keeping the American companies who have plants in China happy, than the American worker (it pays better kickbacks for Bush and his buddies!) .

Finally you make it sound like it's good for the dollar to loose value.  This makes you financially stupid.  Every dollar you owned from three years ago is worth 30% less thanks to Bush's policies.  That means that if you had $100,000 three years ago, Bush has stolen $30,000 in spending power from you.  If this process continues, the dollar will be worth nothing and you'ld be lucky to even have a job that pays you in ever worthless dollars.

You should know that if you live in the US. Everything costs more now, from gas to food to housing and transportation.  

The US economy cannot be competitive unless countries like Japan and China stop intervening in the currency markets.  And Bush hasn't done jacksh@t about it.

 

Offline Ted

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1468
    • AOL Instant Messenger - Rustedhart
    • Yahoo Instant Messenger - ruteha
    • View Profile
    • Email
Good Article from Jack Welch
« Reply #12 on: November 02, 2004, 11:51:39 AM »
Quote
This makes you financially stupid.
I was wondering how living off the market is going for you Rick.
"You take him Perk!" ~Kevin Garnett

"I think the responsibility the Democrats have may rest more in resisting any efforts by Republicans in the Congress or by me when I was President to put some standards in and tighten up a little bit on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac." ~Bill Clinton

rickortreat

  • Guest
Good Article from Jack Welch
« Reply #13 on: November 02, 2004, 01:15:18 PM »
Well Ted,  not good enough.  Trading this market has been very difficult, as it is being dominated by program trades from mutual funds, hedge funds and pension funds.   The professionals I talk with say the futures market is being rigged, by the placeing of overly large bid and ask orders that prevent a free market from funcitoning.  The individual investor has a very small influence on the market.

The thing is these bids and asks are all comming from the same futures account, known by the nuber 990N.  They have since changed the number they trade under, but the effect are still the same.

Although I have made some good money with my gold stocks and funds, I'm not makeing enough income to meet my needs.  At this point, it seems that I'll need to get a job to supliment my income.  As long as I can find good work, that's not a problem for me, as trading only makes me money by taking it out of other people's hands, as oppossed to being productive and earning a living. but the job market seems very tight lately.  

Ted is a fibber

  • Guest
Good Article from Jack Welch
« Reply #14 on: November 02, 2004, 02:36:24 PM »
What happend to not posting anymore political threads???  -koast