Author Topic: Does this even count as a win.  (Read 8968 times)

Offline westkoast

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8624
    • View Profile
    • Email
Does this even count as a win.
« Reply #15 on: August 05, 2004, 03:12:36 PM »
I wasnt comparing the two teams directly.  Just saying that these top players have to be laughing at the fact that since they left the talent not only on the USA Team but in the NBA as a whole as dropped off that much.

2 differences between those two teams now, aside from the talent difference:

1) The OG Dream Team players had alot more pride in what they do and worked alot harder than everyone on this current squad save Tim Duncan.

2) Those guys realized they have to play together and were prof. enough to realize their changed roles.  They knew they all couldn't be the main men.

That to me makes a world of difference.  We didnt send crappy players.  These guys, including Larry Brown, just need to learn how to adjust.  You can slash and cut thru a zone defense...you dont always have to shoot to kill the zone.  Also decent (not even good) ball movement is going to get them high pct shots.
« Last Edit: August 05, 2004, 03:15:47 PM by westkoast »
http://I-Really-Shouldn't-Put-A-Link-To-A-Blog-I-Dont-Even-Update.com

Guest_Randy

  • Guest
Does this even count as a win.
« Reply #16 on: August 05, 2004, 03:15:35 PM »
Quote
Quote
What Joe said.  Dream Team 1 would have smacked the sh*t out of this team, or any team we could field today.  Todays stars are mental midgets compared to those guys.
Hell no!

I'm a 80's era snob myself but no way does the original Dream Team smack the shizz out of the top NBA talent in today's game.
WOW, you may be right if you are talking NBA rules -- but Joe is right, under International rules, the current Dream Team would lose to Dream Team #1 -- and badly.  Personally, I don't think that today's dream team could beat Dream Team #1 -- MJ was as good a defensive player as their ever have been and the backcourt of Ewing, DRob, Malone and Barkley (in their prime) is better than Shaq and TD (plus whatever else you want to throw in there).  Also, Magic and Stockton?  MJ, Mullins, Pip?

I just think that Dream Team #1 would play much better team defense than the present real dream team could (or even would).  Not to mention, the previous outside shooters were MUCH better than our current ones.

Offline Wolverine

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 513
    • AOL Instant Messenger - CardsMizzou
    • View Profile
    • Email
Does this even count as a win.
« Reply #17 on: August 05, 2004, 07:05:05 PM »
Quote
Which thing that I said - that our players today aren't as good as those of yesteryear, or that it's all Wolverine's fault since he's got the most players on the team?

Welcome to the party, Caleb.
I resemble that!   :D  
This message was brought to you by Diet Dr. Pepper.  It tastes more like regular Dr. Pepper.

Cards' 2010 regular season record: 50-41

Offline Reality

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8738
    • View Profile
    • Email
Does this even count as a win.
« Reply #18 on: August 05, 2004, 08:30:00 PM »
Could the 2004 team stop being referred or inferred as a "Dream Team".

No Garnett, Shaq, Kobe, Ray Allen, healthy Kidd, healthy Malone off bench etc.   2004 Athens is not a Dream lineup.  Not even close.

Fine if you want to compare make it fair.  2004s team to 1992 with Bird and a bunch of '92 rookies and few if any of the top '92 players.  Certainly no center.  

Todays true top 12 vs Dream Team 1 would not be a foregone conclusion.  -Circa WoW 2004.
« Last Edit: August 13, 2004, 05:36:57 AM by Reality »

Rickortreat

  • Guest
Does this even count as a win.
« Reply #19 on: August 07, 2004, 10:59:49 PM »
No way would a team of the best NBA players today be competitive with Dream Team 1.  It wouldn't even be close.  There isn't a player who could handle MJ, no-one in the olympics wanted to guard Barkley and they didn't even need to play them because there was so much depth.  Magic Johnson would tear apart the current version, blowing up any defense they cared to put up. Those guys plus Bird are so far ahead of the current team  it's an insult to compare the two, the only player on this team that would have any business playing with those guys is Tim Duncan.  

Iverson wouldn't even play behind MJ, Magic & Stockton.  And you could even say the same thing about the players that aren't in the Olympics.  Kobe as oppossed to Magic or Jordan? No way.    :rolleyes:  

Offline Reality

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8738
    • View Profile
    • Email
Does this even count as a win.
« Reply #20 on: August 08, 2004, 01:22:57 AM »
Lets not forget that tough competition that Dream Team 1 faced.  This tidbit from NBA.com (in case you didnt see the games yourself):

"One player, while trying to guard Magic Johnson, was seen frantically waving to a camera-wielding teammate on the bench, signaling to make sure he got a picture of them together."

A front line of Kevin Garnett, Shaq, and Timmy Dunker?  WoW and I will coach the current Real Dream Team vs 1992.  Bring it.
 

Offline Derek Bodner

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3040
    • AOL Instant Messenger - dbodner22
    • Yahoo Instant Messenger - dabodz
    • View Profile
    • http://www.phillyarena.com
    • Email
Does this even count as a win.
« Reply #21 on: August 08, 2004, 08:58:39 AM »
Quote
A front line of Kevin Garnett, Shaq, and Timmy Dunker? WoW and I will coach the current Real Dream Team vs 1992. Bring it.

You think the current team's having problems with floor spacing?

Guest_Randy

  • Guest
Does this even count as a win.
« Reply #22 on: August 08, 2004, 10:50:20 AM »
Quote
Lets not forget that tough competition that Dream Team 1 faced.  This tidbit from NBA.com (in case you didnt see the games yourself):

"One player, while trying to guard Magic Johnson, was seen frantically waving to a camera-wielding teammate on the bench, signaling to make sure he got a picture of them together."

A front line of Kevin Garnett, Shaq, and Timmy Dunker?  WoW and I will coach the current Real Dream Team vs 1992.  Bring it.
Reality,

Several problems with you concept:

1)  Remember, you are talking INTERNATIONAL play, not the NBA.  Shaq isn't going to fare well in international rules with his "back down" play.  They simply don't allow the "force" play that the NBA, at least at this point, seems to love.

2)  KG would be an excellent defensive player for the US -- as a SF, the guy could roam and play team defense much like Pip did, however, I think Pip was a better team defender in the passing lanes while KG is better defending the basket (shotblocking).  

3)  Shaq, TD and KG vs. DRob, Ewing, Malone and Barkley.  Not to mention the original dream team also had Pip, Magic, MJ, Bird.  They were ALL better shooters and all of them were better passers as well.  Shaq is a very good passing big man but with that exception, the original dream team was a MUCH better passing squad -- in the frontcourt as well as the backcourt.  

4)  I think with Shaq, TD and KG, you would have players who would pass the ball and share -- something that with the exception of a few players, a current dream team wouldn't have.  The NBA has changed a GREAT deal over the years -- egos have risen with the inflation of salary and there isn't a player in the current dream team (I'm talking todays REAL dream team -- not the one that is playing in Athens) who can say that they are better than their counter parts on the original dream team.  I am a big fan of Kobe (on the court) and I still think he would have a hard time folding into the team concept the way that MJ did.  These guys were not only professional but also quite mature and most were at the heighth of their career and had already proven themselves.  Kobe, TMac and some of the current "dream team" players still feel they have an awful lot to prove, IMO.  This is also a problem with the CURRENT "doomed" team.

Offline Reality

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8738
    • View Profile
    • Email
Does this even count as a win.
« Reply #23 on: August 08, 2004, 11:21:39 AM »
Randy,

1)  You mean all that stuff I've been saying about Shaq being one dimensional is true?  Save for writerman, Dennis and a few others, you ALL have been calling Shaq the Most Dominant EVER, EVER, EVER.  All of you since the days of MSNbc.
The backdown rule alone is going to sink him?  Wow, how MDEVER.

Shaqs occasional demonstrated ability to be more then a lane clogging dunker (run the floor, jump hooks, 10 ft jumpers, motivated defender) I have acknowledged when he has performed these, which he has on several occasions.  With WoW and I as coach his potential will be realized.
And dabods, as to floor spacing, the question would be how would your Dream 1 get rebounds vs KG Shaq TD.  

2) KG would be playing forward and his 7'5" wingspan or whatever it is would reek havoc with your much smaller fwds.  KG would not even be playing Pip and if he was KG would smoke him on the offensive end.  And as to Pip-Squeak, introduce Tayshon Prince.  Prince has the same wingspan as Pip and i say could counterbalance him

3.  Malone and Barkley?  Great position rebounders but good luck against the front line i mentioned.  Also introducing BenWa and Ron Artest to match either Barkley or Malones beef.  Johny Stockton meet J Kidd.

4.  I must know, do you all consider Shaq MDE or are you withdrawing?  The shooting %s of our frontline superb.  We will match that with any on your team.  We will run the offense thru them, probably taking 75% of the shots.  Kobadiah Springfield will get his wish and get Jordan.  We may take a hit there, but i do not see Jordan walking all over Kobadiah.  Our other guard will be Ray Allen, Rip H.  Tmac can come in at either SG or Small F, if he is hitting we leave him in, if not out.  AI the pouter may or may not even be on our team.  If so bench.  Ditto, if he is hot we will spot him in, if not hes gonzo.  
  Dream 1s vastly superiour mid range jumpers we will control the O and D boards and count on The Frontlines shooting % to limit your shot attempts.
« Last Edit: August 08, 2004, 12:27:48 PM by Reality »

Guest_Randy

  • Guest
Does this even count as a win.
« Reply #24 on: August 08, 2004, 12:27:51 PM »
Quote
Quote
Quote
Lets not forget that tough competition that Dream Team 1 faced.  This tidbit from NBA.com (in case you didnt see the games yourself):

"One player, while trying to guard Magic Johnson, was seen frantically waving to a camera-wielding teammate on the bench, signaling to make sure he got a picture of them together."

A front line of Kevin Garnett, Shaq, and Timmy Dunker?  WoW and I will coach the current Real Dream Team vs 1992.  Bring it.
Reality,

Several problems with you concept:

1)  Remember, you are talking INTERNATIONAL play, not the NBA.  Shaq isn't going to fare well in international rules with his "back down" play.  They simply don't allow the "force" play that the NBA, at least at this point, seems to love.

2)  KG would be an excellent defensive player for the US -- as a SF, the guy could roam and play team defense much like Pip did, however, I think Pip was a better team defender in the passing lanes while KG is better defending the basket (shotblocking).  

3)  Shaq, TD and KG vs. DRob, Ewing, Malone and Barkley.  Not to mention the original dream team also had Pip, Magic, MJ, Bird.  They were ALL better shooters and all of them were better passers as well.  Shaq is a very good passing big man but with that exception, the original dream team was a MUCH better passing squad -- in the frontcourt as well as the backcourt.  

4)  I think with Shaq, TD and KG, you would have players who would pass the ball and share -- something that with the exception of a few players, a current dream team wouldn't have.  The NBA has changed a GREAT deal over the years -- egos have risen with the inflation of salary and there isn't a player in the current dream team (I'm talking todays REAL dream team -- not the one that is playing in Athens) who can say that they are better than their counter parts on the original dream team.  I am a big fan of Kobe (on the court) and I still think he would have a hard time folding into the team concept the way that MJ did.  These guys were not only professional but also quite mature and most were at the heighth of their career and had already proven themselves.  Kobe, TMac and some of the current "dream team" players still feel they have an awful lot to prove, IMO.  This is also a problem with the CURRENT "doomed" team.
Randy,
I know it tickles you when i answer each so here it is.

1)  You mean all that stuff I've been saying about Shaq being one dimensional is true?  Save for writerman, Dennis and a few others, you ALL have been calling Shaq the Most Dominant EVER, EVER, EVER.  All of you since the days of MSNbc.

Shaqs demonstrated occasional ability to be more then a lane clogging dunker I have acknowledged.  With WoW and I as coach his potential will be realized.
And dabods, as to floor spacing, the question would be how would your Dream 1 get rebounds vs KG Shaq TD.  

2) KG would be playing forward and his 7'5" wingspan or whatever it is would reek havoc with your much smaller fwds.  KG would not even be playing Pip.  And as to Pip squeak, introduce Tayshon Prince.  Prince has the same wingspan as Pip and i say could counterbalance him

3.  Malone and Barkley?  Great position rebounders but good luck against the front line i mentioned.  Also introducing BenWa to match either Barkley or Malones beef.
to be continued......
Reality, when you actually talk basketball rather than just ripping the Lakers (you can't even post about the Lakers rationally or objectively), I enjoy talking basketball with you.  

Umm, a couple of problems with your post:

Quote
1) You mean all that stuff I've been saying about Shaq being one dimensional is true? Save for writerman, Dennis and a few others, you ALL have been calling Shaq the Most Dominant EVER, EVER, EVER. All of you since the days of MSNbc.

I have never stated that Shaq is the most dominant player ever, ever, ever.  I have said he is the most dominant in the game.  Bringing up Writerman is a mistake, Writerman hated Shaq as much as you hate the Lakers and must have been a conquest and lover of Wilt the way he wrote about him.  Umm, if Wilt was such a great shooter, why did he have to jump from the freethrow line to dunk the ball?  Wilt was so strong that he could throw Shaq around like a ragdoll.  Blah, blah, blah.  Shaq's play is PERFECT for the NBA today and the way the game is played today in the NBA makes Shaq the most dominant player.  Shaq is the most dominant player in the NBA today -- has been for quite a few years -- it's a combination of his strength, size and quick feet.  All of those things are negated in the International game.  Shaq WOULD be a help on defense but a player who is quicker like Ben Wallace would be a better player for international play than Shaq, IMO.  International play is just sooo different from the NBA.  It's a lot more like Euro ball -- emphasis on zone and outside shooting -- where the NBA puts emphasis on individual play, size and strength in the post, athleticism and showmanship.  Why do you think Euro players are coming over to the NBA for their shooting ability?

By-the-way, for the record, who did I say was the best center ever in the NBA?  It wasn't Shaq, was it?  I believe Kareem was the best center to ever play the game -- Hakeem was second.  Shaq would rate in the top 5, though, IMO.


Quote
2) KG would be playing forward and his 7'5" wingspan or whatever it is would reek havoc with your much smaller fwds. KG would not even be playing Pip. And as to Pip squeak, introduce Tayshon Prince. Prince has the same wingspan as Pip and i say could counterbalance him

You were talking about a present day dream team (best NBA stars) against past dream team, correct?  That means KG at SF so he WOULD be playing Pip.  And, with a present day "dream team" Tayshon Prince would NOT be chosen.  I, personally, believe that our present "doomed" team would be better off with Prince and Melo or Marion rather than both of these players.  Prince is a much better defender and a better team defender.  But Pip brought a lot more to the dream team than his defense, great shooting from outside and the ability to run the floor and orchestrate the offense.  KG can't do that as well as Pip could and Prince can't do that at all.  

Quote
3. Malone and Barkley? Great position rebounders but good luck against the front line i mentioned. Also introducing BenWa to match either Barkley or Malones beef.

Umm, I would think that you would stop and think about the playoffs this year before you would make such a comment.  Both Malone and Barkley are great defenders -- Malone is an EXCELLENT one and has a lot of ability around the basket.  You don't think that he did a great job against TD this year?  I thought you already conceeded that point.  As for BenWa, DRob was as quick, as strong and had better abilities than BenWa ever had.  BenWa is a great player but DRob was better -- even if he was a Spur.  

TD is, IMO, the best PF to ever play the game -- but Malone wrote the book of PF that TD must have read and studied.  I think you are forgetting that.  I think Malone proved himself during the playoffs this year and remember, he was in his PRIME in dream team #1.  Shaq is a poor choice for International play -- while the NBA emphasizes his size and strength in the post, the International play negates all of that.  TD is fundamental and so is KG -- both would excel (and TD is) in International play -- but neither would have the supporting cast that the first dream team had.  

PG - Magic, Stockton (the best passers to ever play the game)
SG - MJ and Mullins (MJ is the greatest individual player to ever play the game and an incredible defender -- Mullins was an excellent shooter)
SF - Bird and Pip (Bird is one of the best shooters to ever play the game and a very good passer -- Pip was a great team defender and could play point SF)
PF - Malone and Barkley (Malone rewrote the book on PF -- his offense, defense and passing is incredible and Barkley was a smart savvy player with offense range and a wide array of arsenal)
C - DRob and Ewing -- not the best centers to have ever played the game but both are in the top 10, IMO.  If you have to choose a center for zone defense, DRob is one of the top choices to have ever played the game, IMO -- esp. when you look at what he brings at the offensive end as well.  He is PERFECT for the International game all around and I can't think of a better player outside of Kareem for international play.  Ewing, in his prime, was a very good zone defender and his offense also was perfect for international play -- good range and the ability to mix up his offense (you don't get that with Shaq).

Dream Team #1 didn't play the kind of world talent that our current team faces but they wouldn't have lost a game and the games, while they might not be blowouts, wouldn't have been in question -- EVER!  Dream Team #1 had everything: passing, shooting, scorers, rebounding, defense, team defense and incredible chemistry.  Look what is missing with todays "doomed team" -- no passing, no shooting and no team defense.  Even today's "dream team" would be missing the passing that the first dream team had.  Sure, JKidd is a great passer but Magic and Stockton were the best -- but look beyond that -- TD isn't a great passer, Shaq is but KG isn't either.  TMac, Kobe, Redd, Melo, James, etc. -- none of these guys are the kind of passers that existed on the first dream team -- Kobe and James are probably the best passers on the team and Kobe looks to score first rather than finding the open man and James isn't a good enough shooter to demand the double teams that the original dream team demanded.  

Look at each position and the combination that they possessed in the following areas:  shooting, scoring, passing, defense, rebounding, steals, shotblocking, team defense and chemistry.  When you put that combination together, the original dream team is the best team that you could assemble in any decade, IMO -- at least to date.  I don't think the rest of the world would stand in awe of the original dream team like they did years ago but there still wouldn't be a question that they were the best team ever assembled (and here I'm sounding like I'm talking about the original Avengers "go avengers").

 

Offline Reality

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8738
    • View Profile
    • Email
Does this even count as a win.
« Reply #25 on: August 09, 2004, 02:28:50 AM »
Quote
 
Randy,

Oh oh.  Your post starts out with "I never said..." B)
Writerman sure did have some crazy ideas to a lot of you.  Like Indy has some good young talent and could make some noise the next couple years.  Yeah he sure was Krazy on that one.  

So Shaq is the most dominant player, but not ever, not even close, but today.  Okay.  Well while you might not have posted that it has been posted ad nausem by 75% of this board.  As for today I sure can see where Shaq has been the most dominant the last two years.  How Ben Was snaps down 22 rebounds a game against him is a testimony to his dominance.  Dont even get me started on the stats when Shaq and Tim Dunker square off one on one.

So you have Pip Squek getting the best of KG.  Of course if Pip is in the game, that means only one of three of Bird, Barkley and Malone can be in.  Front line of TD Shaq KG is going to be had by Pip, Bird, and DRob?  Not a chance in Sheol.
Answer me how Pip Bird and DRob are going to stop our front line.

As for the playoffs, i sure did see KG go for 24 and 13 average vs Malone.  That average includes the 1st 4 games where ABC dictated geezer Malone could hand check KG.  KG gettin to the line a farceful twice per game.  Once that was stopped he went for 35 and 20.  Lets not digress into those facts.  Buts lets do on the fact that KG had virtually NO ONE to defer to.  Alien Cassel and Troy Hud were both out.  Meanwhile Malone was having 4 HOFlamers to help on D.  Please.  You think KG left out to hang on a weakened MN team is the same as KG with a front line and guards of Kobme and JKidd?  jn feel free to jump in here.  And bullstink that KG cannot pass.  Hes had many a game leading the TWolves in assists as he is top scored and rebounder.  Pippen outplaying KG?  NO way!

I am going to have Shaq TD and KG pass the ball to each other.  Not just to the guards.  Again you tell me how your frontline of DRob and two 6'8" players are gonna stop them.  Drob and Ewing in at the same time?  Whichever plays forward will get outsped X4 by either KG or TD.  Besides BenWa for backup we have JOneal.

Tashon Prince.  Who says we cant have him on a 2004 Dream team.  You mean Stern and his phonies?  We dont care.  Prince is on the team.

Magics passing, especially to Gerald Henderson to help seal the 84 title, is indeed good.  Stockton excellent.  But as for passing only JKidd is right there with them.  Yes he is.

As to Dream 1 winning without question in Athens, so would a true Dream Team today.  But to make it fair, lets put todays Dream Team against 1992 Worlds olympic teams.  Game over.  Now lets put '92 Dream 1 against todays World Oly teams.  Todays Oly World team is not gonna stand around during a game and yell to teamates to "snap that photo!"  Oh Dream 1 would outsmart todays World Olympic teams but not like the laughers in '92.

Not yet final roster

C Shraq
C ?? havent decided yet may just have TD KG Ben Wa slide over and add speed elsewhere
F Tim Dunker
F KG
F J Oneal
F Ben Wa
G-F Ron Artest
G-F Tayshon Prince
G J Kidd
G Kobadiah Springfield
G Ray Allen or TMac
G Redd
« Last Edit: August 09, 2004, 02:34:52 AM by Reality »

Offline JoMal

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3361
    • View Profile
    • http://
    • Email
Does this even count as a win.
« Reply #26 on: August 09, 2004, 11:11:28 AM »
You guys are funny!

Comparing the best basketball players of differents eras is the ultimate in futility, but hey, it's fun.

But Joe is mostly right. Fundamental team play will prevail in the International tournaments most of the time, especially now that the world has been gaining on the Americans in talent. The fundamentals are taught from the crib to the foreign players, while 'hood basketball that favors flash over substance has been the norm in the U.S. for the last decade or longer. Most of these Europeans, for instance, don't come close to even mediocre NBA players in athleticism, but their fundamental basketball has obviously been good enough on occasion to shock the U.S. team.  

But which "Dream" team would beat the other? Clearly, WOW is ignoring the simple fact that the current "best" U.S. NBA players could never compete with the original because they literally would not be caught dead competing in International play, under International rules.. So let's consider just the attitude between these teams. Hmmm, todays best players have a bad one, while the best from 1992 all jumped at the chance to represent their country.

Could that translate into the originals had a bigger desire to prove themselves on the world arena and bring the NBA game to other countries, which generated a huge basketball interest and resulted in better players emerging to compete with today's American born player, who now does not want to be shown up by the rest of the world? Sure looks that way.

So the question you have to ask is, would the original Dream Team stars still have jumped at the chance to prove themselves against the best the world has to offer in TODAY'S International competition just like they did when other countries could not field the more competitive teams they would face.

Magic, Bird, Barkley, Jordan and the rest of the original dream team players all are reknown for loving the competition and the challenge. They hated to lose. Today's best? Someone mentioned a player on another team spent more time posing for pictures for a friend on the bench with a camera rather then try to guard Magic. It seems our current American players would be more inclined to copy that style of play then actually try to understand and learn the rules of International basketball.

You think these prima donnas of today could compete with the original Dream Team, Wow? Not from sitting on their butts in Cancun they won't.
« Last Edit: August 09, 2004, 11:12:15 AM by JoMal »
"We must not confuse dissent with disloyalty.....We will not be driven by fear into an age of unreason.....We are not descended from fearful men, not from men who feared to write, to speak, to associate and to defend causes that were for the moment unpopular....We cannot defend freedom abroad by deserting it at home."

Offline Reality

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8738
    • View Profile
    • Email
Does this even count as a win.
« Reply #27 on: August 09, 2004, 06:12:04 PM »
Quote
You guys are funny!

Comparing the best basketball players of differents eras is the ultimate in futility, but hey, it's fun.


So the question you have to ask is, would the original Dream Team stars still have jumped at the chance to prove themselves against the best the world has to offer in TODAY'S International competition just like they did when other countries could not field the more competitive teams they would face.

Magic, Bird, Barkley, Jordan and the rest of the original dream team players all are reknown for loving the competition and the challenge. They hated to lose.
Is having fun okay?  B)

Please fill in for me how the fundamentally sound '92 team is going to take it to the '04 front line.

Also, since its NBA vs NBA why would it have to be played under international rules?

The original supercompetetors also did not have to practice and instead played golf between games.  They also balked at the thought of staying in the Olympic Village with their fellow US team peons, in spite of many a US team member saying it would show unity and equality.  Instead insisting they stay at a 5 star hotel nearby.  Spare us the humility garbage on Bird, Jordan, Magic etc.

Oh lets not forget MJ and the ruffle over whether he would wear a Nike warm up jersey or the team sponsored Adidas or whatever it was.  No these guys were all in it for their deep love of USA.   :rofl:  

Offline JoMal

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3361
    • View Profile
    • http://
    • Email
Does this even count as a win.
« Reply #28 on: August 09, 2004, 06:58:00 PM »

Quote
Please fill in for me how the fundamentally sound '92 team is going to take it to the '04 front line.

Glad to. One word - committment. The '92 squad had committed players right down the line. Our current bunch of "heroes" lack that committment and therefore can't play as a team, only individuals. I am convinced of that.  

Quote
Also, since its NBA vs NBA why would it have to be played under international rules?

Because the whole point of putting the teams together is to play in the international tournaments, so let's apply the rules to which they both would have to play under.
« Last Edit: August 09, 2004, 06:58:41 PM by JoMal »
"We must not confuse dissent with disloyalty.....We will not be driven by fear into an age of unreason.....We are not descended from fearful men, not from men who feared to write, to speak, to associate and to defend causes that were for the moment unpopular....We cannot defend freedom abroad by deserting it at home."

Offline WayOutWest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7411
    • View Profile
Does this even count as a win.
« Reply #29 on: August 10, 2004, 12:35:48 AM »
Great discussion, I'll be back soon to correct all you "Dream Team 1" ... what's that term..."krishnahs".

I'm am one of the biggest, and obviously most knowledgable, fans of 80's basketball and no way in flogging H-E-double hockey sticks does Dream Team I dominate, or even win, against the best the current American NBA has to offer.

#5 Shaq - there is no comparrison other than Kareem, Wilt and Gilmore, last I checked none of those guys were on Dream Team I.

#4 TD - greatest PF to EVER play the game.  You'd have to go back to Kevin McHale for a comperable player and he wasn't on Dream Team I either.  Even in his prime Karl Malone was not the defensive presence that TD has been.


gotta sleep, I'll be Baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaack!
"History shouldn't be a mystery"
"Our story is real history"
"Not his story"

"My people's culture was strong, it was pure"
"And if not for that white greed"
"It would've endured"

"Laker hate causes blindness"