Author Topic: OT:Clear Channel Blocking Anti-War sign  (Read 1680 times)

Offline spursfan101

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1166
    • View Profile
    • http://
    • Email
OT:Clear Channel Blocking Anti-War sign
« on: July 13, 2004, 03:20:03 PM »
:ot: Clear Channel is a BIG Bush supporter. Locally, they disbanded all the liberal programming and replaced it with the standard Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity republican staples, so this is no suprise...

AP) An anti-war group claims media giant Clear Channel Communications is unfairly trying to block it from displaying a billboard in Times Square opposing the Iraq war.

The group, which calls itself Project Billboard, says it agreed to pay Clear Channel $368,000 to show the billboard for three months — from Aug. 2 until Election Day, November 2 — on the side of a hotel at 45th Street and Broadway.

The billboard, 69 feet by 44 feet, was to show a stylized bomb and fuse, decorated in stars and stripes, above the message, "Democracy is best taught by example, not by war."

But when Clear Channel learned of the intended message, the company labeled the message distasteful and blocked the anti-war group from displaying it, according to papers filed in Manhattan federal court.

The contract allows Clear Channel, which owns the billboard space, to revoke the billboard if it is obscene, "misleading or deceptive" or "offensive to the moral standards of the community," court papers say.

Project Billboard planned to ask a federal judge Tuesday to force Clear Channel to allow the sign to go up.

Paul Meyer, president and chief executive officer of Clear Channel, told The New York Times his company objected not to the sign's text but to the image of the bomb.

But the anti-war group claims Clear Channel also rejected modified versions of the billboard, including one that replaced the bomb with a dove, saying it would not allow any reference to war.


 
Paul

Offline Ted

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1468
    • AOL Instant Messenger - Rustedhart
    • Yahoo Instant Messenger - ruteha
    • View Profile
    • Email
OT:Clear Channel Blocking Anti-War sign
« Reply #1 on: July 13, 2004, 03:50:16 PM »
Quote
:ot: Clear Channel is a BIG Bush supporter. Locally, they disbanded all the liberal programming and replaced it with the standard Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity republican staples, so this is no suprise...

AP) An anti-war group claims media giant Clear Channel Communications is unfairly trying to block it from displaying a billboard in Times Square opposing the Iraq war.

The group, which calls itself Project Billboard, says it agreed to pay Clear Channel $368,000 to show the billboard for three months — from Aug. 2 until Election Day, November 2 — on the side of a hotel at 45th Street and Broadway.

The billboard, 69 feet by 44 feet, was to show a stylized bomb and fuse, decorated in stars and stripes, above the message, "Democracy is best taught by example, not by war."

But when Clear Channel learned of the intended message, the company labeled the message distasteful and blocked the anti-war group from displaying it, according to papers filed in Manhattan federal court.

The contract allows Clear Channel, which owns the billboard space, to revoke the billboard if it is obscene, "misleading or deceptive" or "offensive to the moral standards of the community," court papers say.

Project Billboard planned to ask a federal judge Tuesday to force Clear Channel to allow the sign to go up.

Paul Meyer, president and chief executive officer of Clear Channel, told The New York Times his company objected not to the sign's text but to the image of the bomb.

But the anti-war group claims Clear Channel also rejected modified versions of the billboard, including one that replaced the bomb with a dove, saying it would not allow any reference to war.
Well, personally I say this is lame. Put the sign up. I can kind of see them not liking the bomb, but what's wrong with the dove? Sounds like Clear Channel is pushing an agenda just a little too hard. Why don't they just offer the space to a pro-war group at a cut rate? :up:  
"You take him Perk!" ~Kevin Garnett

"I think the responsibility the Democrats have may rest more in resisting any efforts by Republicans in the Congress or by me when I was President to put some standards in and tighten up a little bit on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac." ~Bill Clinton

Offline spursfan101

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1166
    • View Profile
    • http://
    • Email
OT:Clear Channel Blocking Anti-War sign
« Reply #2 on: July 13, 2004, 05:13:47 PM »
Quote
Well, personally I say this is lame. Put the sign up. I can kind of see them not liking the bomb, but what's wrong with the dove? Sounds like Clear Channel is pushing an agenda just a little too hard. Why don't they just offer the space to a pro-war group at a cut rate?


EXACTLY.  Don't be same blatant with your agenda.
Paul

Offline westkoast

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8624
    • View Profile
    • Email
OT:Clear Channel Blocking Anti-War sign
« Reply #3 on: July 13, 2004, 05:42:40 PM »
What kind of image does that give Clear Channel if they put that up?  Why would a company that owns radio stations want to be associated with people being allowed to think and say what they want?  <_<  
« Last Edit: July 13, 2004, 05:51:58 PM by westkoast »
http://I-Really-Shouldn't-Put-A-Link-To-A-Blog-I-Dont-Even-Update.com

Offline spursfan101

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1166
    • View Profile
    • http://
    • Email
OT:Clear Channel Blocking Anti-War sign
« Reply #4 on: July 14, 2004, 08:17:51 AM »
Quote
What kind of image does that give Clear Channel if they put that up? Why would a company that owns radio stations want to be associated with people being allowed to think and say what they want? 

Uhh...maybe because that's THEIR JOB???? :alcohol:  
Paul

Guest

  • Guest
OT:Clear Channel Blocking Anti-War sign
« Reply #5 on: July 14, 2004, 11:12:19 AM »
Quote
Quote
What kind of image does that give Clear Channel if they put that up? Why would a company that owns radio stations want to be associated with people being allowed to think and say what they want? 

Uhh...maybe because that's THEIR JOB???? :alcohol:
 :bash: