Author Topic: Anyone want Vin Baker?  (Read 1881 times)

jn

  • Guest
Anyone want Vin Baker?
« on: February 18, 2004, 03:50:12 PM »
Coming soon to an IBL or CBA or USBA game near you.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=1738113

Offline Randy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 836
    • View Profile
    • Email
Anyone want Vin Baker?
« Reply #1 on: February 18, 2004, 03:55:50 PM »
Actually, I heard that Zeke wants Baker -- and you will be surprised at the number of teams who would sign the guy for the minimum (I'm sure LA would -- they need a strong third scenario in their soap opera there).  I actually, don't have a problem with Baker being signed someone -- esp. for the minimum, because it may force him to deal with his problem.  He thought he was making $36 mill and he DIDN'T have to deal with his problem -- and of the course the players union is trying to protect his right to be an addict and not be worthwhile to the team.  That is SUCH a joke!  This is one area that the NFL just laughs at the NBA.

Offline spursfan101

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1166
    • View Profile
    • http://
    • Email
Anyone want Vin Baker?
« Reply #2 on: February 18, 2004, 03:58:30 PM »
A JOKE?  NO... the Major League BASEBALL Salary Cap (or lack of one) is a joke.
Paul

Offline Randy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 836
    • View Profile
    • Email
Anyone want Vin Baker?
« Reply #3 on: February 18, 2004, 04:08:58 PM »
Quote
A JOKE? NO... the Major League BASEBALL Salary Cap (or lack of one) is a joke.

You are absolutely right, 101.  This is a beautiful picture of players unions at their worst.  Look at the three major sports -- the Players Union runs MLB -- they don't want a cap and they don't get one?  Why?  They are willing to strike and MLB doesn't want to take the hit so they allow the players all kinds of concessions.  The union doesn't want a cap because they know the Yankees will continue to drive up players salaries -- but by doing so it's horrible for the game because it puts a caste system in baseball.  Cities without the fanbase and the revenue of NY and Seattle end up with their best players being medium tier players -- unless they prove some youngsters and then they see them go to the top level teams for the max.  

Basketball is number two in that scenario.  They do have a cap but most teams aren't willing to take the hit on the cap in order to sign players long-term.  The NBA is so-so (give and take) in this situation -- some is good, some is bad.  It's better than paying mediocre players more than what they are worth -- want some great examples?  Ron Mercer -- getting big bucks back when the payday was hot, Brian Grant, etc.  Most teams are learning now but players want to start playing for a contender or a team that will give big money to their players long term (Dallas, Portland, NY, etc.).  

The NFL does have a cap and it doesn't have to pay a player that gets hurt or doesn't produce.  They simply cut them if they don't want them -- no contract is guaranteed.  Not fair to players altogether but it's a win-win situation for the owners and the league.