Being what Reality refers to as a "NON-LAKER", I feel it is my perogative to respond to a direct inquiry about this game.
No, I did not see this game. This makes me, if anything, overqualified to comment on the foul differential, and the referreeing, as I see fit. Clearly the favoritism awarded the Lakers at the foul line is a direct consequence of the fourth quarter of game six of the Laker/King 2002 playoff series. Undoubtedly the same refs who mucked up that earlier game were reminiscing about the looks on the Kings' players faces after every bogus call and wanted to reenact those expressions with the Suns players.
BTW, for those of you who actually DID see this game, did they succeed?
The "Who gives a rats asterisk board about non-playoff teams" is that way -------------------->
Does anyone miss that little Peoria tard?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->
<------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I went over there, WOW, and checked them out. All they do is pour whine in their beers and cry little tears. You guys are much more fun. It's like poking a koala bear lying in the road to see if it is still alive.
Will it move?
Will it care?
Will it just attack you unaware?