Umm, this has an INCREDIBLY biased slant to it, doesn't it? I mean, where's the interview with Vlade? Oh, yeah, perhaps he wouldn't be as kind as to the way the Kings organization lied to him?
I think there is some MAJOR slanting here -- sure, most of these guys have struggled. But where the Kings USED to be isn't where the Kings are any more. You can't go back to the past -- you have to live in the present and while the Kings squad USED to be like family, the organization has broken up the family and they are simply another group of guys learning to play like a team.
Ever hear the glory days of the Blazers? IMO, SacTown was the reincarnation of the way the Blazers ruled Portland and the chemistry they experienced as a squad. It went downhill after Clyde the Glide retired.
Ever hear Jeff Hornicek talk about his days in Utah?
Ever hear about GP and Kemp (during the glory days of the Sonics) talk about their days in Seattle?
There are a LOT of organizations who can say these things at "one time." However, how many players are going to say based on the next two years as a Sacramento King?
They traded SEVERAL players as they are sliding down the hill toward retirement to teams that are struggling to even make a playoff run and this article seems to make us believe that SacTown is the promised land?
But the biggest example is Jason "White Chocolate" Williams, the article basically states that Williams was at least as good a player in SacTown as he is today.
The Kings afterlife of Jason Williams is the most perplexing. Since he was traded to Memphis in 2001, his production has nearly mirrored his statistical achievements in Sacramento. His persona, however, has only diminished.
Umm, most of Williams stats are MUCH better than when he was in SacTown. All of his percentages (FG, 3pt and FT) are up and while his assists aren't as high, his TO's are HALF of what they once used to be. I think this article seems to FORGET the fact that SportsCenter used to show his ERRANT passes -- the ones that were thrown behind the back at 50 mph to a teammate who couldn't handle the ball and it went out of bounds. Is THIS what the article is celebrating as a "better" environment? PLEASE! SacTown whined about Williams inability to harness his talent and play under control -- he NEVER managed that in SacTown and when he goes to a team that manages to "harness" his talent (yes, that DID hurt his image since they begin to teach him that the best pass is actually the one that completes the play) this article seems to lead us to believe that it's not as good as being in SacTown throwing the ball out-of-bounds or pulling up (and missing) a 3 point shot when no one for the Kings is under the basket and ready to rebound the ball.
I think MOST of the Kings players will tell you that playing in a small market is fun -- but wouldn't MOST players say that when a team is fun and exciting to watch (and winning games?).
Ask Celtic players who were part of the glory days?
Or the Bad Boys in Detroit?
Or the Blazer players with Drexler, etc.
Or the Sonics players before the meltdown.
Or the Utah Jazz during their fun days.
I think the small market DOES have it's advantages when a team is fun, exciting and most of all, WINNING! Ask Cleveland players now if they are having fun and enjoying the small market? I think they are? Why? Because they are winning (well, esp. compared to what they used to do) and everyone knows them.
I just question how "true" this article will be 2 years from now -- if the Kings AREN'T winning, if the chemistry the team experienced has left (as it seems to have now) -- when it's not the "in" thing to root for the team. Utah USED to be the toughest place to play bball in the NBA because their arena was SOOOO loud -- those days are gone. SacTown USED to have that advantage -- dare I say it's gone from that arena as well?