Author Topic: Sixers/Sactown game.  (Read 839 times)

Rickortreat

  • Guest
Sixers/Sactown game.
« on: February 27, 2005, 11:48:24 AM »
Had the privelage of seeing Webber and AI on the court for the first time against the Kings.  I figured without Peja playing, the Sixer would have an edge, and they could have won, but did not.

The biggest difference in the game was shooting percentage.  The Sixers shot at .402 for the game, while the Kings shot .442.  

The Sixers out shot, out rebounded and out assisted the Kings.  One might say they should have won, and were very close to taking it at the end, but the Kings were tougher down the stretch.

After pulling out to double-digit leads on the Kings twice, each time the Kings managed to reel the Sixers back in.  Their defensive pressure, hurt the Sixers half-court offense, and it's clear that it will take some time for the Sixers to learn how to play against that type of pressure offensively.

Sixers were hurt by a short bench, with Willie Green and John Salmons on the injured list.  In a game as close as this one was, a mere one or two shots could have made the difference.

The Kings are a more mature team, and they know what it takes to win games.  The Sixers don't have such a defined personality yet.   In spite of AI and Webber, the rest of the team is still too young.  The rest of this season and the playoffs will be about maturing the young group and them learning the mental toughness that it takes to win against the good teams in the NBA.

Meanwhile, the Kings are still a good team.  Corliss Williamson and Kenny Thomas can both score, and at times Corliss can be a primary scorer, at least against short teams.  Once they have a healthy Peja back, (and he looked pretty good warming up before the game) they should still be a formidible opponent in the WC.
 

Offline Derek Bodner

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3040
    • AOL Instant Messenger - dbodner22
    • Yahoo Instant Messenger - dabodz
    • View Profile
    • http://www.phillyarena.com
    • Email
Sixers/Sactown game.
« Reply #1 on: February 27, 2005, 03:51:00 PM »
Webber and Iverson shot like crap.  Frankly, whenever they play like that the Sixers will lose.  Not to mention the team-wide choke in the final 3 minutes (2 consecutive turnovers leading to fast breaks, 2 missed free throws by Iguodala, 2 missed free throws by dalembert, airballed 3 by Iguodala).

CWebb looked like....well, like he didn't know what he was doing.  Which is to be expected since he hasn't had a full practice with the team.

But in the first (and partially 3rd) quarter you saw what this team can be.  I haven't seen ball movement like that in years.  The passing lanes were wide open.  Passing became contagious.   We now have good passers at 4 positions of our starting lineup.  With Webber and Korver spreading the floor, not only should the driving lanes be wide open, but the cutters as well.  Iguodala was the biggest beneficiary of this last night, getting many easy dunks off of nice looks.  Last night on Korver's opening 3, it was Webber's screen that got him that look, occupying two defenders.  His simple knowledge of the game is going to help us a ton.

Obviously, Webber's shooting (and pick and roll ability) will open up the driving lanes for AI.  But I'm torn if the biggest beneficiary is going to be Iguodala (on cuts), Korver (on open 3's) or Dalembert (on low post passes).  None of these guys really create their own shot (Iguodala can create, but more likely for other people, not himself), and having 2 players out there with such ability to create for others is going to open it up for them.

I thought Webber and Dalembert looked real good together.  They compliment each other well.  With Webbers huge mits, size, and knowledge he's still a good defensive rebounder.  And with Dalembert's athletic ability he's good at crashing the boards.  For the break, Webber's the best outlet passer we've had hear in many years.  His limited ability to run the break doesn't matter much, since Dalembert's probably the fastest endline to endline center in the game.  Dalembert will run the break, Webber will trail.

When Jackson came in, however, they're a much worse fit.  Jackson might be the one pf/c slower than Webber.  And to compound matters they both like playing offensively at the high post.  There were a few times where they literally almost stationed themselves next to each other.  Jackson's not incompetent in the post, he's just going to have to adjust his game.

I was glad to see O'brien adjust his defensive system a little bit.  He didn't front the post like he normally does.  Although, he did still hard trap the pick and roll.  I'm not sure if this was a by product of playing to Webber's strengths or Webber simply not knowing the system.  I think it's not knowing the system, but I hope it's an adjustment.  Chris won't have the mobility to front the post then do the rotating that's required.  And he won't be able to hard trap a pick and roll and get back to his man.  He can still be a marginally effective 1-1 post defender with his bulk (although short, quick guys like Kenny Thomas are always going to cause him problems).  I hope O'brien doesn't make his lack of mobility even worse by asking him to do things he's incapable of.

Offline JoMal

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3361
    • View Profile
    • http://
    • Email
Sixers/Sactown game.
« Reply #2 on: February 28, 2005, 02:50:31 PM »
What was more interesting were the contributions of the new Kings. All three played and contributed, getting  a combined 16 boards, 4 assists, 4 steals, scoring 33 points, and though Skinner did nothing in either the rebounds or scoring categories, he got two blocks in ten minutes.

There is definitely a different look to the Kings now. Though scoring is expected from everyone on the court with the Kings, this interior work on rebounds and tougher defense has been lacking. They are completely raw in their execution yet, as would be expected, but you can tell their teammates are telling them to take the shot if they get the ball.

Not a bad start, and it continued the following night in Washington, where you could say an even tougher opponent awaited the Kings. Another two point victory, and yet we have to wait until the Kings face up with one of their tough western conference foes to really judge where this trade has left them.
« Last Edit: February 28, 2005, 02:51:07 PM by JoMal »
"We must not confuse dissent with disloyalty.....We will not be driven by fear into an age of unreason.....We are not descended from fearful men, not from men who feared to write, to speak, to associate and to defend causes that were for the moment unpopular....We cannot defend freedom abroad by deserting it at home."