Yes, dbodner, after this year, the Kings took on more salary, but I just can't complain about the value of play we are getting for our bucks.
Skinner and Thomas combined versus the Sixers - 33 points on 15-31 shooting, 34 rebounds, 9 assists, 3 blocks (all Skinners), 4 steals, and 6 turnovers (all Thomas) in 73 minutes. (Williamson sat out this game due to migraines)
Webber's line - 20 points on 8-26 shooting, 10 boards, 3 assists, 1 block, 2 steals, and 3 turnovers in 40 minutes. Of course, it would help if Barnes were also playing, but JOB once again has absolutely no clue as to what he has sitting at the end of his bench.
Combined salary for 2004/05 for the new Kings = $9,998,437, even with Williamson's salary, this total is $15,498,437, compared to Webber's $17,531,250 or to combine it with Barnes and Bradley's 2004/05 salaries, $18,871,702. So this season, the edge in salary goes to the Kings.
The salaries after the 2004/05 season, (the combined salaries starting in 2005/06 of all parties to the end of the contracts), the Kings have to pay out $65,356,249, while the Sixers pay essentially Webber $62,156,250, unless they resign either Bradley or Barnes after the season, which is unlikely.
So for the next five seasons, out till Thomas' contract runs out in 2009/10, the Kings have to pay out an extra $3,199,999, or pro rated over those five years, $639,999.80 annually.
I think I would be willing to pay a bit more each year to be getting 33 points, 34 rebounds, 9 assists, 3 blocks, 4 steals, even with the 6 turnovers on any given night. Even when you consider those numbers WITHOUT Williamson's contributions.
By the way, didn't Webber come with a set of instructions, stating that he should never play any where near 40 minutes in the second of a back-to-back, if you want to keep him fresh and available later on? You know, when you will really be needing him? In the playoffs? His last shot, he came down so wobbly I thought he would fall over.
On another point, are you sure JOB could not find some minutes to play Brian Skinner? That just boggles my mind.