I hope this displays OK, if not anyone have any ideas on how to make it better
CODY ZELLER
First I am going to include a table showing Cody Zeller?s Physical Attributes, and then how those compare to the average player of his general height and weight.
Name Height Inches no Shoes Height Inches w/shoes Weight Body Fat Hand Length Hand Width Wingspan Inches Reach in Inches No Step Vert Reach in Inches Max Vert Reach in inches No Step Vert Max Vert Bench Agility Sprint Cody Zeller 83 84.25 230 4.8% 8.5 10.5 83 106 142 143.5 35.5 37.5 10.82 3.15
|
Now this is how those relate to other players of his general height and weight
Name Weight > than standard (in lbs) Body Fat < than Standard (as a % of BF) Reach > than standard (in inches) Wingspan > than standard (in inches) Vertical > than standard (in inches) Speed > than standard (in sec) Agility > than standard (in sec) Cody Zeller -10 -3.15% -4.24 -4.16 9.53 0.12 0.84
|
So Cody Zeller?s weight relative to his height means he weighs 10 lbs less than an average player of his height. His reach is 4.24? less than ?average?, his wingspan is 4.16? less than average, but his no step vertical is 9.53? greater than ?average?, he did the ? court sprint 0.12 seconds faster than ?average?, and did the agility drill 0.84 faster than average. In short for a player of his general size Cody Zeller has poor to very poor length, but he is very good to exceptional athletically.
Here is a list of recent NBA draftees who were the most similar to Cody Zeller physically, and the degree of physical similarity.
Jason Smith 95.46% Perry Jones 93.62% Jon Leuer 92.81% Joakim Noah 92.55% Arnett Moultrie 91.83% Blake Griffin 91.82% Kevin Pittsnogle 91.80% Mason Plumlee 91.46% Andrea Bargnani 91.44% Tyler Zeller 90.92% Pops Mensah-Bonsu 90.78% Thaddeus Young 90.75% Harrison Barnes 90.72% Miles Plumlee 90.63% Jeff Taylor 90.61% Chris Anstey 90.61%
|
When considering Cody Zeller?s physical attributes, and his Freshman season the two best seasons of total comparability are;
Cody Zeller 19 Big Ten Player Season League Statistical Similarity Donald Hodge 20 Atlantic 10 94.1% Dale Davis 19 Atlantic Coast 93.7% Dale Davis 20 Atlantic Coast 93.8% Derrick Coleman 19 Big East 93.5% Cherokee Parks 20 Atlantic Coast 93.4% Lorenzen Wright 19 Conference USA 93.5% Adam Keefe 19 Pacific 12 94.3% Cherokee Parks 21 Atlantic Coast 94.0% Donald Hodge 21 Atlantic 10 92.0% Paul Davis 19 Big Ten 95.2% Alaa Abdelnaby 21 Atlantic Coast 96.3% Othella Harrington 19 Big East 95.0% Terry Mills 20 Big Ten 92.7% Matt Geiger 22 Atlantic Coast 93.8% Lorenzen Wright 20 Conference USA 93.0% D.J. White 19 Big Ten 93.8% Derrick Alston 19 Atlantic 10 92.8% Terry Mills 22 Big Ten 93.0% Derrick Coleman 20 Big East 92.5% Calvin Booth 19 Big Ten 89.7%
|
Cody Zeller 20 Big Ten Player Season League Statistical Similarity Donald Hodge 20 Atlantic 10 94.7% Cherokee Parks 21 Atlantic Coast 94.8% Dale Davis 20 Atlantic Coast 93.5% Lorenzen Wright 19 Conference USA 94.8% Lorenzen Wright 20 Conference USA 94.1% Christian Laettner 20 Atlantic Coast 93.4% Alec Kessler 22 Southeastern 93.5% Clifford Rozier 20 Big East 94.5% Calvin Booth 22 Big Ten 93.7% Othella Harrington 19 Big East 96.5% Adam Keefe 19 Pacific 12 95.4% Anthony Avent 21 Big East 96.1% Terry Mills 22 Big Ten 93.6% Dale Davis 19 Atlantic Coast 92.6% Cherokee Parks 20 Atlantic Coast 92.2% Derrick Coleman 20 Big East 92.9% Othella Harrington 20 Big East 95.6% Raef LaFrentz 20 Big-12 93.3% Derrick Coleman 19 Big East 93.2% Donald Hodge 21 Atlantic 10 91.0%
|
So in short
Very Best Case Comps - Derrick Coleman, Christian Laettner 15%
Likely Best Case - Dales Davis, Raef LaFrentz 12%
Most Likely - Matt Geiger, Lorenzen Wright, Terry Mills 40%
Likely Worst Case - Cherokee Parks, Alaa Abdelnaby 18%
Absolute Worst Case - Donald Hodge, Derrick Alston 15%
This is the projected statistical line for his first 3 seasons;
Season Shooting Statistics Totals FG FGA FG% 2P 2PA 2P% 3P 3PA 3P% FT FTA FT% TS% eFG% Cody Zeller 1 268 560 48.0% 264 546 48.5% 4 13 30.0% 165 232 70.9% 52.8% 48.4% Cody Zeller 2 270 562 48.2% 263 539 48.9% 7 23 29.5% 161 222 72.6% 53.2% 48.8% Cody Zeller 3 314 653 48.2% 307 623 49.2% 8 29 26.2% 209 277 75.5% 54.0% 48.8% 3 Year Average 285 594 48.1% 279 571 48.9% 6 22 28.5% 179 245 73.1% 53.4% 48.7% Season Accumulation Stats Totals ORB DRB TRB AST STL BLK TOV A/TO PF PTS Cody Zeller 1 163 250 406 73 47 56 109 0.67 183 705 Cody Zeller 2 175 304 474 91 45 71 108 0.85 208 708 Cody Zeller 3 176 305 473 107 48 77 120 0.89 213 845 3 Year Average 172 288 452 91 47 68 113 0.81 202 756 Season Shooting Statistics per 36 Minutes FG FGA FG% 2P 2PA 2P% 3P 3PA 3P% FT FTA FT% TS% eFG% Cody Zeller 1 5.86 12.20 48.0% 5.77 11.91 48.5% 0.09 0.29 29.7% 3.58 5.05 70.9% 52.8% 48.4% Cody Zeller 2 5.51 11.45 48.2% 5.38 10.98 49.0% 0.14 0.46 30.0% 3.28 4.51 72.6% 53.2% 48.8% Cody Zeller 3 6.02 12.50 48.2% 5.87 11.94 49.2% 0.15 0.56 26.2% 4.00 5.30 75.5% 54.0% 48.8% 3 Year Average 5.8 12.1 48.1% 5.7 11.6 48.9% 0.1 0.4 28.6% 3.6 5.0 73.1% 53.4% 48.7% Season Accumulation Stats per 36 Minutes ORB DRB TRB AST STL BLK TOV A/TO PF PTS Cody Zeller 1 3.56 5.43 8.83 1.60 1.02 1.22 2.37 0.67 4.00 15.39 Cody Zeller 2 3.58 6.19 9.66 1.86 0.92 1.44 2.20 0.85 4.26 14.44 Cody Zeller 3 3.37 5.84 9.06 2.05 0.93 1.47 2.29 0.89 4.08 16.19 3 Year Average 3.5 5.8 9.2 1.8 1.0 1.4 2.3 0.81 4.1 15.4 Season Usage Stats ORB% DRB% TRB% AST% STL% BLK% TOV% USG% Cody Zeller 1 10.8% 16.8% 13.5% 6.4% 1.4% 2.1% 14.5% 18.2% Cody Zeller 2 10.2% 17.3% 13.5% 7.7% 1.4% 2.6% 14.0% 18.0% Cody Zeller 3 10.6% 18.0% 14.1% 8.4% 1.3% 2.7% 13.6% 19.6% 3 Year Average 10.5% 17.4% 13.7% 7.5% 1.4% 2.5% 14.0% 18.6% Season Advanced Measurements PER ORtg DRtg OWS DWS WS WS/48 Cody Zeller 1 14.20 110.5 112.2 1.13 1.62 2.95 0.083 Cody Zeller 2 14.77 112.0 111.5 1.70 1.59 3.42 0.088 Cody Zeller 3 16.43 114.3 109.5 2.54 2.24 4.95 0.117 3 Year Average 15.18 112.3 111.0 5.4 5.4 11.32 0.097
|
Overall Cody Zeller will be a league about a league average player for his first 3 NBA seasons. He will be a highly efficient offensive player (112.3 Points per 100 possessions, 15.4 points per 36 minutes, 53.4% true shooting %), but a very poor defensive player (allow 111 points per 100 possessions). He will be a slightly below average rebounding big man, but will have a reasonable number of blocks, and will not be overly foul prone.