But when Spurs won it was Lakers that played badly.
Grow some nuts.
Umm, Reality, you've posted these different results -- would you mind clarifying (for the record) which one you are going to actually stick with?
The Spurs lost because of:
a) the refs
B) bad shooting
I know it's tough for you to take ANY stand -- but actually try it for a change.
LA came out way better then Game one or two. Completely different. Made up their minds quickly on offensive passes, also played much quicker defense and team defense. Very dissapointed with Spurs return to veg ball offense. Props to LA for the D but dont stand SA around pausing with the ball and help their aggresiveness. Duncan was pathetic at times.
Can SA shoot that poorly again? I hope not.
This is CLASSIC Reality -- it's why I've grown to loathe your stupid posts -- first, you rip a poster for basically saying: The Spurs won because the Lakers played badly -- RIGHT after you post that the Lakes won because the Spurs played badly.
Just want to make sure that you eat your own words:
Grow some nuts.