I was surprised by how bad Fishers last shot looked. If I'm not mistaken there wer 4 seconds left. Seems like he rushed it and that he may have even had a good chance to use a pump fake to either step to the side for a better look or even draw a foul.
I know everyone is going to laugh when I say this, but it's simply Fisher's inexperience in such a situation.
Fisher has never faced the pressure of being the go-to player. For all the clutch shots he's made, he's made them while being a nice option, or a desperation attempt. He's not been the one the play is being drawn up for - the one who has the potential to be the goat. Up until now, it's always been him being the UNEXPECTED lift, rather than the EXPECTED finisher.
I'm sure some of you are going to argue that being clutch in one situation is the same as being clutch in the other, and I couldn't disagree more. There's a difference in being "I want the ball, and it's on me either way" and "I'm ready for the ball if it comes my way." Players who are like the former are the superstars: Reggie Miller, Jordan, Kobe, Ray Allen - players who are like the latter include Fisher, Robert Horry, Steve Kerr, Sean Elliott. The former group will create the shot (or in the case of some, create the situation) that they want; the latter group simply fills in for the situation created by the former. This time, Fisher was put in the role of potential creator, and instead of improvising when the unexpected happened, he did what he ALWAYS does in that situation: take the jumper.
About a week or two ago, I wouldn't have posted those thoughts, and probably wouldn't have even though about things that way, but a recent basketball game that I played in really brought this point home to me. I've been in many games where I've taken late-in-game shots that were key; in fact, this week I've hit two game-winners. But I'm a Derek Fisher, not a Reggie Miller. I cannibalize the mistake made by the defense, and if I'm spotted, I'm solid - but if left to my own devices to create the game-winning shot, people have to be playing lazy defense or it just plain ain't gonna happen. The counter-example to that is Skander; he's a Reggie Miller. He wants the ball in those clutch situations, and he's perfectly willing to be the hero or the goat, knowing he's going to be the hero most often. If he's given that same shot that I'd take, he may or may not take it...it's not the same stake-through-the-heart shot when he takes it, because he's EXPECTED to carry the heavy load. He's better off creating for himself; he's more comfortable if I just give him the ball and let him go to work, rather than setting up for him the shot that I'd want. It's the difference between a star and a role player.
Fisher was put in the position of star, and it's the wrong position for him to be in. He's the side-threat, not the primary threat. The play should have been drawn up for Kobe. Doing that would have put Fisher in his proper role, thereby making him more effective if the time came for him to take the shot.