« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Author Topic: Spurs  (Read 4251 times)

Offline Reality

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8738
    • View Profile
    • Email
Spurs
« on: April 20, 2004, 01:59:04 PM »
good game by all, but how about Bob Horry.

Do any of us care if he doesnt have a "Hall of Flame" title?

beers all around.
 
Logged

Offline westkoast

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8624
    • View Profile
    • Email
Spurs
« Reply #1 on: April 20, 2004, 02:19:57 PM »
Id care if this was posted by a real Spurs fan........but you my friend change teams like Paris Hilton changes boyfriends.
Logged
http://I-Really-Shouldn't-Put-A-Link-To-A-Blog-I-Dont-Even-Update.com

Offline Reality

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8738
    • View Profile
    • Email
Spurs
« Reply #2 on: April 20, 2004, 03:27:31 PM »
Quote
Id care if this was posted by a real Spurs fan........but you my friend change teams like Paris Hilton changes boyfriends.
You may find the following article parts helpful:

The word fan is taken from the word "fanatical"
It is also of interest to note the definition given to the word “fanatic” by Webster’s Third New International Dictionary, 1961 edition. It says:

‘Fanatic—Latin, inspired by a deity.
  • 1. possessed by or as if by a demon; broadly: crazed, frantic, mad.
  • 2. governed, produced, or characterized by too great zeal: extravagant, unreasonable; excessively enthusiastic, especially on religious subjects.’
Like spursfan101 I don't know many bandwagon Spurs fans, but am aware of the millions of global Laker bandwagon fans along with a lifetime Fan like yourself.  
Logged

Offline Randy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 836
    • View Profile
    • Email
Spurs
« Reply #3 on: April 20, 2004, 04:31:38 PM »
Quote
Quote
Id care if this was posted by a real Spurs fan........but you my friend change teams like Paris Hilton changes boyfriends.
You may find the following article parts helpful:

The word fan is taken from the word "fanatical"
It is also of interest to note the definition given to the word “fanatic” by Webster’s Third New International Dictionary, 1961 edition. It says:

‘Fanatic—Latin, inspired by a deity.
  • 1. possessed by or as if by a demon; broadly: crazed, frantic, mad.
  • 2. governed, produced, or characterized by too great zeal: extravagant, unreasonable; excessively enthusiastic, especially on religious subjects.’
Like spursfan101 I don't know many bandwagon Spurs fans, but am aware of the millions of global Laker bandwagon fans along with a lifetime Fan like yourself.
You know what's funny?  You type all of that every time but you refuse to answer the question.  You've changed allegiance because of TD -- TD is an awesome player and I could probably root for his team too -- if he played for the Lakers!
Logged

Offline Reality

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8738
    • View Profile
    • Email
Spurs
« Reply #4 on: April 20, 2004, 07:30:24 PM »
Quote
You know what's funny?  You type all of that every time but you refuse to answer the question.  You've changed allegiance because of TD -- TD is an awesome player and I could probably root for his team too -- if he played for the Lakers!
Randy,

There wasn't any question.  But if your vision included a question, and you thought it was funny, i guess that's okay.  ;)  
Logged

Offline Lurker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3705
    • View Profile
    • Email
Spurs
« Reply #5 on: April 21, 2004, 08:39:21 AM »
Quote
Quote
You know what's funny?  You type all of that every time but you refuse to answer the question.  You've changed allegiance because of TD -- TD is an awesome player and I could probably root for his team too -- if he played for the Lakers!
Randy,

There wasn't any question.  But if your vision included a question, and you thought it was funny, i guess that's okay.  ;)
You have to forgive Randy.  He has problems with reading comprehension whenever the word "Spurs" is used in a post.

 :ph34r:  
Logged
It riles them to believe that you perceive the web they weave.  Keep on thinking free.
-Moody Blues

Offline Laker Fan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1255
    • View Profile
Spurs
« Reply #6 on: April 21, 2004, 08:57:28 AM »
It's better than having no comprehension, knowledge, or grasp of reality whatsoever whenever it basketball in general is mention in a post, Spurs bandwagoners are famous for that weakness.
« Last Edit: April 21, 2004, 10:16:39 AM by Laker Fan »
Logged
Dan

Offline Lurker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3705
    • View Profile
    • Email
Spurs
« Reply #7 on: April 21, 2004, 09:15:28 AM »
Quote
Spurs banwagoners
You forgot the "D"....something that should never happen in a discussion about the Spurs.   ;)  
Logged
It riles them to believe that you perceive the web they weave.  Keep on thinking free.
-Moody Blues

Offline westkoast

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8624
    • View Profile
    • Email
Spurs
« Reply #8 on: April 21, 2004, 10:07:54 AM »
Quote
Quote
Id care if this was posted by a real Spurs fan........but you my friend change teams like Paris Hilton changes boyfriends.
You may find the following article parts helpful:

The word fan is taken from the word "fanatical"
It is also of interest to note the definition given to the word “fanatic” by Webster’s Third New International Dictionary, 1961 edition. It says:

‘Fanatic—Latin, inspired by a deity.
    [/li][li]1. possessed by or as if by a demon; broadly: crazed, frantic, mad.

    [/li]
    [/li][li]2. governed, produced, or characterized by too great zeal: extravagant, unreasonable; excessively enthusiastic, especially on religious subjects.’

    [/li]
Like spursfan101 I don't know many bandwagon Spurs fans, but am aware of the millions of global Laker bandwagon fans along with a lifetime Fan like yourself.
Going to Websters.com is not going to change the fact that a few years ago you were a Celtics fan.  Then you became a fan of no one but really liked the Clippers and now you are a die hard Spurs fan.  You know this would have been perfect if you had not been posting with all of us for a few years now.  You didnt start to even really "rep" the Spurs until after last years playoffs.  Which really shows how sad your obsession with the Lakers is.  You are bandwagon, sorry to break it to you.

101, Lurker, x3.....I love talking about the Spurs with you guys.  Just cant take fairweather fans seriously.  As for Horry, I knew that he would be able to contribute to this team.  Especially in the playoffs.  Mitch is an idiot for letting him go....especially seeing how Malone is not 100%, Grant is gone, and our next big man is a Rook.
« Last Edit: April 21, 2004, 10:09:26 AM by westkoast »
Logged
http://I-Really-Shouldn't-Put-A-Link-To-A-Blog-I-Dont-Even-Update.com

Offline Laker Fan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1255
    • View Profile
Spurs
« Reply #9 on: April 21, 2004, 10:19:54 AM »
My humblest apologies BBF, I was remiss, I should have forgotten the "O", because after all, we WERE talking about the Spurs now weren't we?  :D  
Logged
Dan

Offline Reality

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8738
    • View Profile
    • Email
Spurs
« Reply #10 on: April 21, 2004, 08:08:57 PM »
Quote
You didnt start to even really "rep" the Spurs until after last years playoffs. .
Randy err FanDana err Westkoast.  
You'll have to ask WOW about the trash we exchanged back in 2000 when i pulled for Duncan vs The Key Camper.

Posted well before the start of last year i was pulling for the Spurs.  Gaither busted me for my saying they were done if they didnt stop Pops lameoid offense.  This was after 15 games.

It kills you i can pick legit winners.

And for the gap, get it right.  Celtics, Shaun Kemp Sonics now Spurs.  
Oh that Purple n Gold carnage....
Logged

Offline gaither

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 160
    • View Profile
    • Email
Spurs
« Reply #11 on: April 21, 2004, 08:15:37 PM »
Uh-oh, I don't remember busting you, Reality. I usually leave that treatment to the Laker fans on the board.  :D

I don't remember Reality ever claiming to be a Celtics or Clipper fan. I never really knew what his team affiliation was until he came out of the closet last year as a Spurs fan.  
Logged

Offline Reality

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8738
    • View Profile
    • Email
Spurs
« Reply #12 on: April 21, 2004, 08:42:50 PM »
Quote
Uh-oh, I don't remember busting you, Reality. I usually leave that treatment to the Laker fans on the board.  :D

 
Yes I made a thread "The Spurs Are Done" early last season, and while of course i knew they were not "done" it was in response to the lameoid offense they ran and would have been "done" had Pop not adjusted/the players ignored Pop and opened up the O, ie GNob and SJackson and Super Stevie Kerr.

I only recall legitimate "busts".  :lol:  ;)   The other ones are so light i dont feel them.

Oh yeah if you get the Classic Games channel check out Cornbread Maxwell smaking down the Lakers largest marketing icon ever, well prior to Kobme and Shaq, that being Magic.

Game 7 1984.  Have professionals nearby if watching with Laker Krishnas.

 
Logged

Offline westkoast

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8624
    • View Profile
    • Email
Spurs
« Reply #13 on: April 22, 2004, 09:59:41 AM »
Quote
Quote
You didnt start to even really "rep" the Spurs until after last years playoffs. .
Randy err FanDana err Westkoast.  
You'll have to ask WOW about the trash we exchanged back in 2000 when i pulled for Duncan vs The Key Camper.

Posted well before the start of last year i was pulling for the Spurs.  Gaither busted me for my saying they were done if they didnt stop Pops lameoid offense.  This was after 15 games.

It kills you i can pick legit winners.

And for the gap, get it right.  Celtics, Shaun Kemp Sonics now Spurs.  
Oh that Purple n Gold carnage....
Ahhh little buddy......rooting for a player doesnt mean you are a fan of that team.  I root for T-mac all the time but does that make me a Magic fan?  No.  Big difference.  No Reality O'Reily spinning today.  You are bandwagon.  Plain and simple.  This season you have been posting like your name is Spursfan101.  Honestly can you say that the previous 2 years that you were repping the Spurs that much?  Only reason you like them is for the simple fact they beat the Lakers....Like I said before, that just shows how bad your obsession is with the Lakers.

lol @ 'it kills you that I can pick legit winners'.  2000 Reality's legit winner was? Rightttt....2001? Oh good picking again.  2002?  Yup same thing.  1 out of 4.  Not bad.
Logged
http://I-Really-Shouldn't-Put-A-Link-To-A-Blog-I-Dont-Even-Update.com

Offline WayOutWest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7411
    • View Profile
Spurs
« Reply #14 on: April 22, 2004, 12:21:10 PM »
Quote
lol @ 'it kills you that I can pick legit winners'.  2000 Reality's legit winner was? Rightttt....2001? Oh good picking again.  2002?  Yup same thing.  1 out of 4.  Not bad.
WTF!

I thought Dan (total) and myself (percentage) where the "pick em" champs?  ;)
 
Logged
"History shouldn't be a mystery"
"Our story is real history"
"Not his story"

"My people's culture was strong, it was pure"
"And if not for that white greed"
"It would've endured"

"Laker hate causes blindness"
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
« previous next »