1) giving away Thomas because of supposed money
2) trading Marion because they didn't want to resign him for what he is worth
3) taking Shaq (and the only thing bigger than Shaq is his contract) to turn their team around.
1) Losing money on Thomas vs losing money on Shaq is a major difference. Thomas was not going to bring the POSITIVES that Shaq would and has been giving the Suns, mainly rebounding and attitude. The reverse is Thomas probably would not have brought the NEGATIVES that Shaq has brought. I know most of us called it from day one, I didn't think Shaq's negatives would so out weigh positives but there is still time to turn it around for the Suns, especially in the playoffs.
2) That is not why they traded him, way off base on that one Randy. First, they could just let him walk after next year, no big deal moneywise there. Second, they did not feel they could win it all with Marion. Third, and this is what SUPPOSEDLY was the key factor, he was not happy playing on the Suns. He was battling with Amare in the locker room and the Suns wisely chose to put their money on Amare.
3)That turned out to be true, unfortunately they turned around and started losing. But from the outside looking in, Shaq and his history looked great on paper. Like I stated in 1), we all saw the negatives, most of the posters around here stated that the negatives would far out weigh the positives, so far you guys have been correct. I have seen the positives I expected but the negatives have been far more prevelant. There is still a chance IMO for them to turn it around for the playoffs but like the article that WK posted, they may not even make it to the playoffs in order to provide the results of the Shaq experiment.