And tell me...does stopping someone mean making them have bad numbers, or making them lose the game?
I actually have to agree with Rick. These aren't mutually exclusive. Just because a guy lost doesn't mean he didn't do his fair share. Nor does it mean if the sides were reversed (wilt on celtics, russell in sixers) that the roles wouldn't have been reversed.
And, in fact, I'll bet that Baylor and West figure a lot more prominently in terms of greatest players ever than whatever Celtic not named Bill Russell from those historic teams do.
It's a shame Wilt was 32 by the time he got there, and clearly had his best days behind him. This wasn't a prime wilt joining those players.
Regardless, wilt did win a championship when he played with those players.
Russell had the benefit of one of the greatest coaches ever, and the consistency of having him year after year. That was a benefit to the team's success, IMO, and not something you can penalize Wilt for.
Russell was the ultimate TEAM player, on a team that was fit to him perfectly. That doesn't mean Russell stopped Wilt.