The box scores don't tell the whole story in the game of basketball. When you think about it, they really only tell a small part of the story.
This was my response to Reality's post. There is a lot more to basketball than shooting percentage. Maybe he has a high FG% because the majority of his shots are offensive putbacks. Maybe the majority of his turnovers are from offensive plays called for him. Maybe he is inconsistant in rebounding, defense, or even knowing his spot on the floor in the triangle. There are so many more questions than just saying that Bynum is shooting over 50% and be under utilized.
Very true, Lurker.
Anyone who's had a the pleasure and pain of watching every Laker game this season would not be saying that Bynum is being under utilized at this point. He's been given plenty of opportunities to step up. He has a couple of times, but for the most part as the season has gone on he's been extremely inconsistent and downright disappeared at times. Hence the drop in PT. We're seeing this with Farmar as well. I think it's a combination of a couple of things. First, scouting in the league; i.e., the other teams have figured out how to defend these guys effectively, where as early on they flew under the radar. Second is just the fact that they are young players who lack experience and have a ton to learn about the NBA game.
The verdict is still out on Bynum. He teases you with his potential, but at this point as WOW stated early on he could easily end up being just another big jouneyman like a Benoit Benjamin <shudder>.