What *IS* the point? The fact that the person who gave the ball to Shaq the most was the person who had the ball the most is pretty irrelevant in trying to determine the greedy nature of a player.
In words one might understand, if James has the ball 40 times and gives to Skander 4 times (which, for James is awfully darn generous), while I have the ball 5 times and give the ball to Skander twice, it's awfully irrelevant - not to mention MISLEADING - to say that James gave the ball to Skander more than I did. And if Skander is a 50% shooter, and scores on James's passes twice and my passes once, it's awfully irrelevant (and misleading) to say that James had more assists to Skander.
One might even say that in such a scenario, James was being selfish.
One would be right.