Name the 5 best surprises of the 2003-2004 NBA season:
1. That after all the hoopla about it this past off-season, the Laker HOF'ers can't stay healthy and on the court long enough to realyze the "dream". It also clarifies something else. While the other three "HOF'ers get to take equal credit for any success, it only matters whether or not Shaq is healthy and playing, Malone, Payton, and Kobe would make a competitive team, but Shaq and any three non-HOF'ers in their stead would be a threat to win it all.
2.Sam Cassell's fit with the Timberwolves. Finally, Garnett has a serious point guard to aid him in his quest, not only for success in the playoffs, but his personal chance to be recognized as the MVP of the League.
3. That the Lebron hype did not affect the kid once the games started. I started hoping he would fail because I was sick of the buildup. Turns out the kid has the looks of the real deal anyway.
4. The Denver Nuggets early success. This was NOT a very good franchise from top to bottom, but suddenly they are a very competitive team night in and night out.
5. I have to throw in the season the Kings are having. To achieve the best record in basketball requires many things to go right. Pre-season forecasters all agreed that the Kings' off-season moves and the absence of Webber put Sacramento back in the middle of the pack out west. The collapse of the Lakers due to injuries (and other reasons), the stumbling of the Spurs, and Dallas' inexplicable up and down season helped. But in spite of the improved play of the Nuggest (another good team in an already saturated Western Conference), the improvement of Minnesota, and the excellent play of the Pacers, none of them have the record that the Kings have managed to put together so far. It is also clear that no one quite knows what to make of it yet, either.
Name the 5 worst surprises of the 2003-2004 NBA season:
1. Danny Ainge's mismanagement of the Celtics. At some point, someone in that organization has to put a stop to him. This is the classic case of the GM totally undermining the head coach. O'Brien's leaving was a total slap in the face of Ainge's personnel moves that all happened completely against the wishes of the coach.
2.The New Jersey Nets handling of Byron Scott. He was a lame duck since last season, but pride prevented Scott from resigning, which everyone clearly hoped he would do. So firing him after he lead the Nets to two Eastern Championships seems underhanded at best. Could his gameplan have been that bad that the players would rebel against it? No one there really expected that team to beat the best of the West, did they?
3. The fan voting of the All Star selections. This has clearly become a popularity contest and talent be damned. Yao Ming over Shaq? Euurrph! Francis getting the nod over (pick the name of any other top five Western point guard). Talk about latching on to the coattails of Yao right into the All Star starting lineup. Neither should even be ON the All Star roster. Vince Carter getting the most votes? For the love of God, why?
4. The coaching merry-go-round. Is it just me, or are the coaches now considered the ONLY reason that a given team is floundering. Or that the success the team is having is not related necessarily to the abilities of the coach. HUH?? Or that today's coaches can't relate to the hip hop generation, who really resent 'this old guy' trying to tell him that immature antics have no place in the NBA. Or THIS successful coach has to go because I can get THAT successful coach. Or coaches being forced to walk away because they have 'lost the team' because, well, the GM keeps hiding it from him. Face it, "Interim Coach" should apply to every coach, especially in the Atantic Division. Oh, right, it already does.
5. Eddie Griffin. Now trying to take down his second franchise, I wonder why 'Keen Eddie' never received the same type of hype that Lebron or Carmelo have received this year. My question is, besides being the 7th guy picked two years ago, is there any other reason to even give this bozo a cup of coffee in an NBA arena? At some point, you have to ignore any perceived or potential talent and think of the long term ramifications of having a bad influence hanging around your REAL basketball players. Otherwise, you just become the Portland Trailblazers.