Author Topic: How many of you guys think the Cavs were really going hard after Shaq?  (Read 1026 times)

Offline WayOutWest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7411
    • View Profile
Supposedly the Cavs offered Big Ben and Sasha Pavlowhatever for Shaq. 

Would Shaq to the Cavs work?  The Cavs style is more suited for Shaq but could they play Big Z and Shaq together or would one of them have to come off the bench?  Big Z is a pick and pop player so there would not be an issue with Shaq in the paint.  The comments I heard/read were if the Cavs had aquired Shaq it was all OVER.  LeBron and the Cavs would have a guaranteed championship ring.

I don't know how it would have worked out.
"History shouldn't be a mystery"
"Our story is real history"
"Not his story"

"My people's culture was strong, it was pure"
"And if not for that white greed"
"It would've endured"

"Laker hate causes blindness"

Offline westkoast

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8624
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: How many of you guys think the Cavs were really going hard after Shaq?
« Reply #1 on: February 20, 2009, 11:14:07 AM »
A couple of things would have happened:

- The Cavs would go deep in the playoffs, like they would have with out him, yet he would somehow get a huge portion of the credit.

- There would be a new coined super hero phrase along the lines of the justice league or when hulk teamed up with wolverine (dunno if this is true, I dont read comic books)

- Mo Williams would digress and big Z would become useless
http://I-Really-Shouldn't-Put-A-Link-To-A-Blog-I-Dont-Even-Update.com