I've got to disagree with that, gaither. Malone was the Jazz's low-post threat. Malone was to the Jazz what Shaq is to the Lakers or what Duncan is to the Spurs - not what Nowitzki is to the Mavericks.
Malone *COULD* shoot outside, but his primary focus was either rolling off the pick-and-roll, or in the paint on our more-common UCLA set. It wasn't until last year - when Sloan scrapped the UCLA set - that Malone spent more time facing the basket than with his back to it.
Malone stopped pick-and-rolling and started pick-and-popping. As a result, he didn't draw fouls and he didn't get looks from point-blank. And that translated to an awful shooting percentage.
Just look at Malone's shooting percentages his last two years in Utah, and his percentage in Los Angeles this past year. Compare them with his numbers over the course of his career. His last two years in Utah - when he spent more and more time OUTSIDE - stand out as being the two worst years of his career.
Malone simply can't shoot as well from the outside. That's no crime; it's typical. But it's also a sore spot for Malone, who wants to be known as a well-rounded player rather than just a banging bruiser.