Spurs - Lakers tonight

[westkoast]

  I knew that was coming.
Lakers led 66-55 when Bynum was injured.
They won 100-99.
Hence, the Lakers won **without** him.

Anywho we shall see how they do without him.  In the whole game i mean.  Not for 20 minutes.

Yes Lurker the young guns....

Pretty damn simple right?  Even an idiot of your caliber seems to get it.

You can see how they do without him as they are beating teams they are suppose to and losing to the best 2 teams in the west without him.

[Reality]

  I knew that was coming.
Lakers led 66-55 when Bynum was injured.
They won 100-99.
Hence, the Lakers won **without** him.

Anywho we shall see how they do without him.  In the whole game i mean.  Not for 20 minutes.

Yes Lurker the young guns....

Pretty damn simple right?  Even an idiot of your caliber seems to get it.

You can see how they do without him as they are beating teams they are suppose to and losing to the best 2 teams in the west without him.

Yep.  Playing 20 minutes and helping your team go up 15 and then watching them fall in 16 minutes to win by one point means they "won without you."
B-Rad, I'm very concerned about your health.  I think your reality hate has reached a new level.

[Skandery]

These things run in cycles.  After the huge profitteering of 2000-2004 Sternie and Co. have told us he has cooled it on fixing things.

The next run will be coming tho.

WHAT are you talking about!!

Can you say Spurs--Suns 2007!!!

 

[westkoast]

These things run in cycles.  After the huge profitteering of 2000-2004 Sternie and Co. have told us he has cooled it on fixing things.

The next run will be coming tho.

WHAT are you talking about!!

Can you say Spurs--Suns 2007!!!

 

 

He only does things in favor of the Lakers.

[Laker Fan]

Both teams only played 24 minutes of basketball, too bad for LA they played their 24 minutes in the first half and the Spurs, played theirs in the second.

The key that no one seems to be commenting too much on, quite surprising given our resident bandwagon fan, is that Manu Ginobili was OUT OF HIS MIND in the 2nd half! He out hustled and outplayed everyone in terms of changing tempo, momentum, and attitude on the Spurs and so deflated the Lakers it was ridiculous, amazing game by him last night.

[WayOutWest]

These things run in cycles.  After the huge profitteering of 2000-2004 Sternie and Co. have told us he has cooled it on fixing things.
The next run will be coming tho.

Actually, the run started last year, just ask ANYONE who watched the Suns get robbed in the playoffs on nation television.

[Reality]

These things run in cycles.  After the huge profitteering of 2000-2004 Sternie and Co. have told us he has cooled it on fixing things.

The next run will be coming tho.

WHAT are you talking about!!

Can you say Spurs--Suns 2007!!!

 

Skan I can chop WoW in here if you can chop Joe:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GvJaOvF1AKA&feature=related

[Reality]

Good try but they are 3-2 since he went down.  So much for your shot.  Again...think before you post.  Please stop commenting on the Lakers if you don't know what's going on.  Its really annoying to hear a blind man talk about things he can't see. 

Bynum played 20 minutes and sprained his knee in the 3rd qtr vs Memphis.
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/recap?gameId=280113013
Since that game:
@ Seattle W 123-121 OT 
Phoenix L 98-106 
Denver W 116-99
@ San Antonio L 91-103
2-2 in Non Laker Math.

B-Rad?  Your coming twist should be a doozey.

He went down right into the 3rd quarter...they went on to win WITHOUT HIM.  They also beat Seattle and Denver.  That is 3-2 with out Bynum.  Not really twisting you idiot.

The L.A. Times sports headline considers the Lakers winning with Bynums 20 minutes in the Memphis game.    The LA Times is now twisting against Kobe. 
http://www.latimes.com/la-sp-lakers28jan28,0,5226346.story

Hence 2 wins since Byns went down.  2-3.  Make that 2-4 now.