Well i just watched it again. True to memory you are making up a camera angle that doesn't exist. Magical.:rofl:
Kind of like your memory of Kobe being fouled for sure against Utah two weeks ago. :rolleyes:
That one you were able to let the light of truth penetrate. Very encouraging. A break thru of monumental proportions. I'm not going to let your Kings/Lakers storytelling, twisting, backpedalling, downright making things up undo the progress of last week. [/QUOTE]
LMAO @ your obvious lie. Do you honestly think you are going to sit here and say they did not show another angle of the play and everyone is going to believe you? I can even tell you off the top of my head that they showed the angle from the top of the key.
Um Corky, I was one of the first people to say it was a bad call in that thread. As for the Kobe foul, the league this year has stated that they are going to call fouls based on defensive players coming under a shooter. If the shooter is not allowed to come straight down and land in the same exact spot they went up from it is a foul. But aside from that, I said it was a bad call and that he did not hit Kobe. Only went under him and by league rules NOW THIS YEAR it would be a foul. [/quote]
My *obvious lie* would mean you will glady view the tape to point it out? WOW is game.
As to honesty, your self proclaiming you "was one of the first people to say it was a bad call in that thread."...
Is in actuality:
"The problem with the call was the ref turned his head before the shot was fully released and then blew the whistle based on the fact the shot was off, which is why the call was late.
He was clearly behind the line so I guess they had him shoot 2 to make up for the bad call?? Normally that would have been a foul for coming up under the shooter, you just dont call it at the end of the game like that.