If it comes to a decision between having either Iguodala or Smith starting at 12M next year would you want both, onle one(who?) or neither.
I have been pondering that myself. Assuming equal contracts in length (5 years) and amount (max yearly increases) for the sake of the question. Wow, that is a tough one. Value wise it is a little higher than both deserve, but this is a free and sometimes crazy market. This may be the unpopular choice, but I am going to go with Iggy by a hair. Neither one is a franchise player or unstoppable scorer. Both are stat sheet fillers. Edge to Smith for being a big man which is harder to get and on age.
However, I think there is also a bit of a risk with Smith. Most scouting reports I have seen on him don't really come out all that great. He blocks shots at a high rate, but often at the expense of good fundamental D. He shoots a low percentage for a big, yet is not a great outside shooter or three point threat. Some of his appeal is still based on potential. There have also been some questions about his attitude over the years, especially in the coachability department. Difficult to handle is the phrase I have often heard associated with him. He has never played in a market like Philly where the fans can be rough and the media rougher.
Iggy is what he is which is pretty darn good. He makes players around him better and has better fundamentals than Smith. He fits well on the team and despite some over done whining about ref's calls, he has been a pretty good soldier. The grass always looks greener on someone else's team, but the excitement and potential of Smith comes with more flaws and downside risk. I am a big Speights fan which may also influence my decision. If I only had one guy to spend the money on it would have to be the guy I know and trust to produce throughout the contract.